Except that this was with a computer... which everyone knows is mystical and magical and makes it ten times worse. Where are the terrified victims crying out for the DOJ to save them from nefarious "cyber" hackers?
I've often wondered how static routing numbers can be considered secure.
Low cost gyms like this generally require access to a checking account. I imagine they're avoiding the CC processing fees, while ensuring they get their dues promptly each month. But it really creeped me out when I joined one that the only method of payment was to give them access to my routing numbers.
I'm more concerned about the local cops than the CIA. They have significant precedent to extract physical identifiers from your person (DNA, fingerprints) but it's less clear that they can coerce you to divulge a pass-code.
We didn't conduct an investigation on whether we needed to conduct an investigation because we didn't conduct an investigation on whether we needed to conduct an investigation, which wasn't needed because we didn't conduct and an investigation on whether it was needed.
If you torture logic enough, it will say anything you want it to.
The "little cement area" should be the NO free speech zone, and we should be arguing about whether that much restriction was constitutional.
"Want" and "Need" sometimes become indistinguishable when someone else is footing the bill.
How do you think the NSA got all those spy satellites up there? Some kind of Secret NASA? SNASA?
It says here that you were doing 670,000,000 in a 55?
Bank robbers use cars; hello bank robbery MVA fee.
It would make more sense for CBC to tax the babies coming out of hospitals. But that's not saying much.
But he didn't make the U.S. look bad, the abuses made us look bad. He showed us a mirror so we could see how horrible we look to everyone else.
Representative Chu obviously needs to start automating her DMCA take-down notices, how else will she be able to stay ahead of dirty infringers like Representative Bass?
We've always been at war with Eastasia.
"I'm terrified of the unknown, so I'm going to violate the basic rights of my constituents."
Doesn't really sound like something that should get you re-elected in America.
I suggest issuing top secret clearance to every citizen, but then we'd all be subjected to Orwellian double-think where you're not allowed to acknowledge the facts in front of you.
I'm still trying to wrap my brain around "Reverse Hijacking". Is that where you pull your car over next to a pedestrian and make him take your car?
How is it that we elect people like this to represent us?Because our elections choose the people who are good at getting elected, not the people who are good at governing.
Is there some type of Continuing Education Class that lawmakers could take to better understand the differences between what they intend and what they actually write? I'd suggest some kind of introductory programming class if I didn't think it'd be written off as confounding 'cyber' babble.
Instructor: "See, right there in that line you assigned this value to all the variables. Is that what you meant to do? Maybe you should think about how to complete this function without breaking 3 other ones."
I'd be really interested to see some runtime debugging on proposed legislation, maybe understand the ramifications before rolling it into production. Something tells me that most bills wouldn't pass a preliminary syntax and type-check.
Re: Personal responsibility?
This also makes me worry about legitimizing suicide as a recourse against bullying. For kids that feel so powerless and helpless, the prospect of getting back at their tormentors could overshadow better options. Teenagers make terrible decisions every day (case in point) lets not put this prescient out there to further cloud rational judgement.