Last time I checked, with the exception of the random "independent" christian churches that like to claim they have a religious exemption for vaccinations which are specious to begin with, there is literally no organized religion that forbids vaccinations.
Exactly. I can't see the ruling from Judge LeGrow able to stand up to any kind of challenge. It appears like she presided over a kangaroo court in this case.
I would assume the guy can file a lawsuit against the law if he wanted to push the issue. It doesnt seem like something that would stand up to scrutiny in a case.
Why was having a huge chunk of the world boycotting South Africa over apartheid okay, but boycotting Israel for a much worse form of apartheid not okay?
I have a real problem with copyright infringement protected by law as much as it is, and penalties being worse than those of violent crimes against people.
In response to a comment I made criticizing the Author's Guild on twitter, Joanne Harris accused any organization that scans any books still under copyright and makes them lendable online of being pirates, So that means the entire University system of California, MIT, and Yale are all pirates. I'm sure they would be surprised to know that.
I worked for apple for almost 5 years and each time the company pulled some bullshit like this, it just made me doubt the company more and more. When the company was found guilty of e-book price fixing, the execs kept telling the employees "the company" did nothing wrong and "apple" was innocent. I suppose that's true when it was the execs involved that were responsible, but lets not quibble. The company kept pulling shady shit and I couldn't stand it any more.
If this is the behavior of the execs of one of the biggest cable cos in the country, then the courts need to knock them down a peg. What kind of racist bullshit is that?
That's one of the major effects of the CA NN law. It's going to force the fed to either deal with the headache of multiple states NN laws or actually implement real NN on a national level instead of the transparent handouts to the industry.
Let's be clear, the entire broadband industry didn't sue California. The big ISPs run by the bells and cableco did. The independent ISPs Like Sonic.net aren't part of this.
Chromium is the open source platform Chrome is based on, so it wasn't Chrome and Google had nothing to do with it. Also, because of complaints the software company in question has changed their installation process to ask if the user wants CHROMIUM installed and used as a secure browser.
Yes, an "idea" that came from a former CEO of at&t that one day came up with the horrible idea of double-dipping on content providers to pay up or be blocked from at&t's customers, like somehow someone was getting a free ride somewhere despite everyone involved already paying for their bandwidth. Now THAT is anti-trust, if it wasn't for the fact there's a verizon lawyer running the FCC right now.
Well yeah, it "could" be broken up using no legitimate reason, except again, no one is being forced to use these apps. You can use an android device and not use gmail or google search. There are lot of android devices that already do that.
Talk of anti-trust against companies like google or facebook can't be taken seriously while ignoring real anti-trust violations by companies like Comcast, at&t, verizon, disney, etc.
There is no such religious exemption
Last time I checked, with the exception of the random "independent" christian churches that like to claim they have a religious exemption for vaccinations which are specious to begin with, there is literally no organized religion that forbids vaccinations.
Re: Sue the state directly for not understanding basic math
Exactly. I can't see the ruling from Judge LeGrow able to stand up to any kind of challenge. It appears like she presided over a kangaroo court in this case.
Lawsuit?
I would assume the guy can file a lawsuit against the law if he wanted to push the issue. It doesnt seem like something that would stand up to scrutiny in a case.
Re:
I don't know what printers you've been using, but the Canon MFPs I've used for years let me run carts nearly dry.
Oh those bad apples...
Where are all the good apples in the PD again?
Unfortunately....
....while this is showing how broken the youtube copyright claim system is, this is happening to a unapologetic racist and scam artist.
Re: Re:
Why was having a huge chunk of the world boycotting South Africa over apartheid okay, but boycotting Israel for a much worse form of apartheid not okay?
Re: Re: Author Joanne Harris...
I have a real problem with copyright infringement protected by law as much as it is, and penalties being worse than those of violent crimes against people.
Author Joanne Harris...
In response to a comment I made criticizing the Author's Guild on twitter, Joanne Harris accused any organization that scans any books still under copyright and makes them lendable online of being pirates, So that means the entire University system of California, MIT, and Yale are all pirates. I'm sure they would be surprised to know that.
It must be....
Chris Bondurant. He's the only exec from at&t on the advisory board.
I'm sorry. Where are all those "good apples again?
Glad I left
I worked for apple for almost 5 years and each time the company pulled some bullshit like this, it just made me doubt the company more and more. When the company was found guilty of e-book price fixing, the execs kept telling the employees "the company" did nothing wrong and "apple" was innocent. I suppose that's true when it was the execs involved that were responsible, but lets not quibble. The company kept pulling shady shit and I couldn't stand it any more.
These are the execs of one of the biggest cablecos in the US?!
If this is the behavior of the execs of one of the biggest cable cos in the country, then the courts need to knock them down a peg. What kind of racist bullshit is that?
Re: "literally nothing in that statement is true" - Not even OPPOSE?
Do these guys have a list of industry talking points they need to use when the subject comes up?
Re:
That's one of the major effects of the CA NN law. It's going to force the fed to either deal with the headache of multiple states NN laws or actually implement real NN on a national level instead of the transparent handouts to the industry.
Not quite
Let's be clear, the entire broadband industry didn't sue California. The big ISPs run by the bells and cableco did. The independent ISPs Like Sonic.net aren't part of this.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Chromium is the open source platform Chrome is based on, so it wasn't Chrome and Google had nothing to do with it. Also, because of complaints the software company in question has changed their installation process to ask if the user wants CHROMIUM installed and used as a secure browser.
Re: where is the problem??
Yes, an "idea" that came from a former CEO of at&t that one day came up with the horrible idea of double-dipping on content providers to pay up or be blocked from at&t's customers, like somehow someone was getting a free ride somewhere despite everyone involved already paying for their bandwidth. Now THAT is anti-trust, if it wasn't for the fact there's a verizon lawyer running the FCC right now.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So what?
Well yeah, it "could" be broken up using no legitimate reason, except again, no one is being forced to use these apps. You can use an android device and not use gmail or google search. There are lot of android devices that already do that.
Re: Re:
Talk of anti-trust against companies like google or facebook can't be taken seriously while ignoring real anti-trust violations by companies like Comcast, at&t, verizon, disney, etc.