Can you imagine how poor as a people we would be if everything we got now was just a reprint of a 30 year old book?
Or a remake of a 30 year old movie. Oh, wait...
As is Total Recall :(
Please, Hollywood. Leave my Arnie flicks alone. You've already ruined Conan.
I bought a legitimate key from one of those discount key sites for $3, then, lacking any authorised outlet to download the game client from, went off to my trusty file sharing site and downloaded it, at my full connection speed, from about 500 other fans.
In short, yeah, it's probably safer to keep it closed. But sometimes, it's just inconvenient.
Like anti-circumvention technology?
No. You just need to find the right tracker. Every private tracker I know has blazingly fast download speeds from the swarm, because they have rules that promote sharing, and police them. Public trackers can be hit and miss speedwise sometimes, but that is more than made up for the fact that you can get ANYTHING YOU WANT. IN ONE PLACE! It doesn't matter how long it takes.
...or all on heroin.
Hahah. Did you see that AFACT bloke (who interestingly, is an American) go full retard after the decision? I saw it on ABC News 24 at some point I think. But he was spouting all the same tropes we hear on TechDirt about how film piracy was costing the local industry and economy $600 million a year or some such garbage.
It wasn't even original thought. It was almost word for word the same bs the US guys use, like they all went to the same copyright maximilists conference and were handed the same fact sheet on what to say and what not to say to the media and elected officials.
The only bad thing is that he said AFACT would be appealing the decision. Hopefully the courts won't have a bar of it.
6 years. 880 Euros. 1 guy.
40 years. (torrents = 5,867 Euros from 7 guys.)
Please explain your math, or your critical thinking...
Grammar Nazi! "Wait, what if this is taking up a lot more data than I thought? "
[Comment thread etiquette nit: replying to the correct person. It was a quote from the article, not a comment authored by Rekrul.]
If I steal a car, I can share it as much as I damn well like. If nobody knows it's stolen, and I let them use it, thus sharing it, it's not their fault they didn't know it was stolen.
The "stealing" doesn't come from the original owner *losing* access, but from the recipient *gaining* it.
[citation needed]
So why then, is it always the original owner who reports the lost access, rather than the recipient reporting that the original owner no longer has access. It's not that the original owner is complaining that the recipient has gained an item, it's that the owner has lost access to it. Your statement is flawed.
A method of choosing effective prurient dialog for entertainment purposes between a paying customer and an associate, in bed.
We could take over the world, but it's just so so hard to get those motherfucking snakes on a motherfucking plane.
Re: In all honesty
there creation is there property
*Their and their. Jesus Christ.