Seems he's in the position of blaming the expense of putting guardrails on a bridge on the driver who took a picture of the bridge to show they built it without them.
Can you say “in-kind campaign contribution” ?
Can you say “in-kind campaign contribution” ?
It’s not wierd, the point was to illustrate that the pose is a generic catwalk strut. I grabbed the first link I found of catwalk poses, to demonstrate. iAnd as I’ve mentioned above, the contours have more differences than just the slant of the shoulders, what caught my eye is that the Sony artist got the anatomy at the knees and lower right, where the fan art blew it.
It’s not wierd, the point was to illustrate that the pose is a generic catwalk strut. I grabbed the first link I found of catwalk poses, to demonstrate. iAnd as I’ve mentioned above, the contours have more differences than just the slant of the shoulders, what caught my eye is that the Sony artist got the anatomy at the knees and lower right, where the fan art blew it.
I wasn’t going for an exact match, just demonstrating the generic class, one foot in front of the other, hips and shoulders tilted,simply becUse the body does that when walking, one hand curled one hand flexed is a pretty generic “catwalk” pose, I detailed some of the other difences above, the most glaring being that the Sony artist didn’t fall into the “legs tapering off at the knees” bad artists anatomy trap the original did. The Sony artist may well have seen the fan art, and took inspiration on the pose in his picture from it, but that doesn’t change the fact that’s it’s a very commonly used pose in pin up art.
You start really looking at it, and especially if you look at a blown up version like in buzzfeed separated at birth with a close up of the poster that’s -not- cropped to the knee, you start seeing more, the knees in the poster don’t like up vertically like they do in the fanart, you can see the lower leg curve out again higher on the right, where the outward curve of the lower leg is absent entirely in the fan art, the body is a bit thiccker in the poster, and the meeting of arm and body isn’t behind she-venom’s busom. And if you’ve looked around, that curled/splayed hand pose is incredibly commonly used, if for no other reason than they’re both easier to draw than most other hand poses.
Yeah, both Sony and the fan artist using a stupidly commonly used pose is a quite reasonable explanation.
Tell me how imaginary it is,since people publish pose books for just that purpose. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/546272629801560467/ Take a look at #11 there.. That pose file is literally the first thing when you google catwalk poses.
The problem with your argument is that the fame of the statue comes from it’s relationship with Hans Christian Anderson, unless those other cities somehow manage to fake that relationship, then they’re doing it wrong.
taps his large collection of “Pose File” artist reference books that are published with the express intention of the pics being used in that manner
I’m an artist, I’ve done a bloody lot of fan art in my time, but the mutual use of sexy menacing catwalk strut #1, ( https://www.elle.com/uk/fashion/celebrity-style/articles/a31869/an-analysis-of-the-most-iconic-supermodel-runway-walks/ ) does not copyright infringement make. It’s suspicious, sure, but in the end it’s suspicious like late night mail-in ballot dumps for Biden were. When it comes down to it, saying this copies the fan art is the same argument about being able to copyright the “feel” of a song folks here say should be rejected in the Blurred lines case.
I would lay good money that his FOIA, was for communications between OMB/HHS and Facebook/Twitter, ordering the takedown of his post, and they didn't respond because there weren't any to find.
Blockquote Determining classroom curriculum is not an attack on free speech.Tell that to John Thomas Scopes
So, with these cases, let me ask a stupid question, why don't the companies simply claim patent exhaustion and ask that they be replaced with Google?
I had a go-around with Spreadshirt the other day over a T-shirt design with an icon of orange circle with a yellow wave on top asking "MAGA: Where Are You?", and responding "SARS-COV19: I'm In Your Base Killing Your Doodz" - despite the ample amount of Trump merchandise on spreadshirt I was told my design did not make the grade, solely because it featured the Trump-ish icon..
So I am -so- totally going to report their censorship...
:P
"When was the last time allopathic medicine actually cured anything?" Well, that would be the last time someone beat an infection using antibiotics, which would probably be within the last few minutes.
"I was just asking a question, not trolling" https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions
Why bother to link to the original article? Once you read everything that's in that screen cap, all the highlighted text says is that -at they time the wrote the article- (which might be months before it's publication date) there hadn't been big enough trials to pin down a solid number on the degree of protection offered by the vaccine, in a particular subset of the population. While the phrasing of the link implies that they haven't proved that it offer's protection, this is a false premise, they simply haven't been able or nobody had published a reliably certain calculation of the correlation yet.
Odd thought, could their scraping websites for photos be a copyright infringement? Photos do have copyright attached, and while Facebook et.al, have permissive licenses, they have not actually then sublicenced the scraped images to Clearview, who arguably then creates commercial derivative work from them, in the form of their face maps.