Please tell me how you are comparing the punishment for a crime to the cost of a records request.
That kind of logic is, to quote the trolls, freetarded. When you try and tie every wrongdoing back to that of the most gross offenders, you earn every bit of hyperbole that is returned.
ootb and lacking of substance are two very joined parties.
and commenting on the length of posts is what he does right before he puts them in his mouth...
indeed, not to mention the corporate ESPN products are generally streamed live in both audio and video and have podcasts up very quickly. That aside he will recap all his arguments on PTI anyway so thats only a 4-5 hour delay.
See, this is exactly why we have to hide our treaties now.
Did you just compare an exchange to a bank? I think that just clouds any defensive arguments. Can you liken any Forex activities to those of MtGox, where an entire currency is devalued by a single voluminous trade?
that was me.
I like antagonizing the passionate advocates and all, but i hadnt even considered it being of small enough scale for governments to use as target practice, you have probably offed the rest of my day :)
address this: the contention that 'mining' is somehow built in to the system and the future abilities to do so forecast, and that is somehow related to its inflation....
because chances are the only thing you will address (again) is the smarm with which i litter the post.
But my post wasn't addressing the economic side of the debate since that's not the issue you brought up. It was addressing the technical side.
you went off on a tangent about a technical issue.
yeah, i was as lost as you were in your posts. The contention that 'mining' is somehow built in to the system and the future abilities to do so forecast, and that is somehow related to its inflation....is not something i could not readily believe as i cannot place that much faith in any piece of code, so i gave examples highlighting the waterfall effect to the market, when technical flaws are exposed upstream. And they will be exposed.
my post was not addressing the economics either, quite the opposite: when a technical flaw (and implementation as well) causes something as drastic as a complete rollback of currency exchange transactions, that does not equal inflation; nor does 'regular currency' have a limitation that would feasibly allow for such a case.
Suppose I need DH to author, or Marcus to pen a rhyme entitled:
"technical flaws -vs- implementation flaws -vs- ridiculous market fluctuations in a digital currency"
so that i can start telling them apart.
Please tell me more about the 'controls' on this 'decentralized' currency.
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/06/bitcoin-value-plummets-as-main.html
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deflationary_spiral
a currency that can be created out of thin air by everyone interested in doing so, that should be easy enough to make sure your millions don't turn in to ones.
When you have to adjust your currency based on the market, rather than adjusting the market based on currency, something seems very amiss.
"for the encouragement of innovatio...."
the trailing n along with the rest of the reasons are of no regard.
what if i sell hardware running virtualbox with a properly licensed OSX on it? I would really want to see the arguments and ruling in a virtual infringement case.
Yes lets document the aftermath so that the actions can be denied.
What about videotaping the events as they happen sound like the smell you cant get rid of?
But copyfraud isn't not the main problem.
Aha! So it is the main problem.
how many treaties are not signed by all parties? That seems like a fantastic win!
Me and my friends just an Anti-ACTA treaty, guess who didnt sign it? The same people that aren't signing that one!
I can grant you an exclusive license for that work.
..is not the same as granting the 'copy' rights, nor the ability to enforce those rights by questionable means. And you claim we are focused on technicalities, while you only focus on their latest and greatest (which really only meets the late part of that criteria) rewording of what was and has always been a sham contract.
What about that part where they slip money back into the pocket of the licensor based solely on success of their lawsuits? that is just part of the standard licensing agreement?
Re: Re: Re:
x unrealistic fee = x unrealistic fee
except one is a fee and one is a judgement. The RIAA is demanding "fees for downloading" that contention only fuels the opposition.
"x Settlement offer" in no way equals "x unrealistic required fee"