'[...] TSA.gov page on what the agency calls ?Managed Inclusion.?'Might they be referring to "Managed Illusion"?
I am pretty sure this has already been proposed, but I am not sure (and lacking time for a search on TechDirt).Enter DMCA requests against the major abusers. As simple as that. If they can abuse the system for free, so can we...hggdh..
Huh? I think the FS is just speculating. So, I guess, his opinion is damaging UK.As such, he should probably stop talking.
well, not really. She is just protecting herself, after all she is a political leader (as opposed to we the people). And this is why she would never release her mobile metadata.
Let's try it for warrants: There's always probable cause to believe a search will produce evidence of guilt OR reassure us of innocence.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by hggdh.
Submit a story now.
This feature is only available to registered users. You can register here or sign in to use it.
Typo in the TSA program name?
'[...] TSA.gov page on what the agency calls ?Managed Inclusion.?'
Might they be referring to "Managed Illusion"?
Play the game by the (imposed) rules
I am pretty sure this has already been proposed, but I am not sure (and lacking time for a search on TechDirt).
Enter DMCA requests against the major abusers. As simple as that. If they can abuse the system for free, so can we.
..hggdh..
speculating is damaging, I speculate.
Huh? I think the FS is just speculating. So, I guess, his opinion is damaging UK.
As such, he should probably stop talking.
Re: Scumbag Feinstein
well, not really. She is just protecting herself, after all she is a political leader (as opposed to we the people). And this is why she would never release her mobile metadata.
Proving innocence is NP-hard
er. I would rather say "or require more searches".