no, your assuming that any negativity is all liberal hate. yes, i agree there is such a thing but thats NOT whats going on in all cases and to blindly assume/accept that it is is one of the major problems that led us down this sorry road we are on currently.
you also come off as suggesting that i see all issues as being the same thing, and clearly they are not, i also said nothing about russian sex and hacking so im not quite sure why you are including it in your reply to me unless its a separate thought that was just not clearly laid out as such?
your reply makes little sense feel free to explain.
its not all hypocritical liberal hate. while i did not vote for him, i was firmly in the camp of, lets really find out what he actually is going to do first before we all go down the path of being an idiot calling for impeachment before he has even been sworn in.
i am currently horrified by his actions and he is, in my mind, the biggest threat to national security since bin laden got a bug up his ass.
i tend to vote republican and have my entire life.... so... liberal hate? no. genuine and legitimate concern.
and by the way, this is coming from a life long conservative with a huuuge penchant for voting republican.
at this point i couldnt care less about his tax returns. he is business tycoon with multiple failed businesses. there is going to be plenty there for everyone to freak out about and would only serve to distract from the larger issues that we have now. those being; this man is clearly not fit to run any branch of government at any level.
stop following the circus and the lights and lets discuss the real topics of a president attempting to use unconstitutional and unethical means to reach his ends.
you are incredibly wrong.
the time to have their back is "always". Regardless of your feelings of both the previous and current administration.
pretty sure Edmund Burke has a few wise words on the subject. you may want to look em up.
I think the distinction is what the main focus of airbnb is.
the state doesnt regulate me selling my guitar. i can use any number of sites that will allow me to list it either free of charge or for a small fee. But they dont focus on selling only guitars so if someone decides to advertise hooker and blow parties on the go, they are protected by section 230.
airbnb does not have any other function though. since motels and hotels are regulated, and this is the sole purpose of airbnb, it too should fall under the same regulations as motel 6. since i could be advertising a place for rent that included hooker and blow parties- airbnb would have section 230 protections against the hooker and blow party part... but they are still functioning in their one single design of connecting people looking to rent their space with people looking to rent spaces and in that specific function, they would not qualify for 230 protections.
course thats just my own personal viewpoint and im no laywer.
my wish is for my current election mantra to be a complete lie:
Election 2016 - no matter who wins, we all loose.
slippery slopes NEVER go in the right direction. even if you support that particular slope.
Election 2016 - No matter who wins, we all loose.
i cant help but think that had this been any network other than fox, it would have been little more than a blip on the radar.
the guy holds a M.Phil & Ph.D- he should have known better phrasing was needed
by the way- my above point? 78chtrs. it can be done.
i wanted to toss in a completely off the rails over the top response here.... but im too tired and its christmas eve.
you're making the mistake of thinking they are trying to win back any trust in the first place.
sounds like you had a fairly shaky start to the day...
i can tell you that they do fairly well as a brownian motion producer though
Where are all the people standing up to him and either questioning his "evidence" or straight-up calling him a liar?
they appear to all be in this thread?
and it wont matter in any way.... it isnt the news sites that took the action, its legislation.
Sure they will run back to google screaming for them to turn it back up... but the spanish govt has pretty much forced google into the position with no alternative way out.
sooooooo, no one who mentions gg has a valid point to make? its all harassment no matter what their message is?
seeing how i dont care for her music in the first place, i must say UMG, way to go about making damn sure i continue to not hear her music going forward.
but uh... that get lucky song... i was kinda diggin that & i think im gonna go check some more
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ah yisss...
it doesnt make me wonder one bit. they know it. you know they know it... i know they know it... they know they know it...
but thats not the problem. knowing that they know it and being able to PROVE they know it in a court of law are two completely different things. and even if you could prove they knew it.... so what? they basically scammed millions for years doing this kinda crap and if they get caught... they get fined a minor percentage of what they pulled in.
all CEOs know this is being done and its being done deliberately because it makes money... even if they get caught red handed and get fined, they're still going to have more money in the end.