That's interesting. In a way, screaming at pirates for copying your game is a bit like screaming at mouse wheels for not being supported by your program code.
Hello.
You have just given implied permission to Mike to publicly disclose your identity, if he is aware of it.
It is, after all, a requirement for "backing up the claim that you abuse the law for profit."
If you don't think so, we'll take it as "please, oh please don't back up your claim that I abuse the law for profit."
Thank you.
Yes it is. That's why it's [classified]. Don't want the People to find out.
The "children are starving in Africa" fallacy, also known as Appeal to Worse Problems.
What the hell is the point of your comment except... oh, right, you don't have one.
He's probably employed at Disneyland, that would explain his raging hard-on for copyright and dislike of "Intellectuals".
What a jerk-off. No wonder he's all out_of_the_lube.
darryl, I find your comment in this article very troubling. Seems like you're very angry, and maybe capable of committing some sort of violent crime. That makes you a threat, and a criminal and a run of the mill thug. Seems to me like you need to be jailed without bail.
Woo! I won something!
Well, I used a pseudonym. But still.
out_of_the_blue just loves it when the blind are ostracized.
That would be lying about an actual inquiry.
Otherwise, if I say "my arm itches" and it didn't, it would be a felony.
So, the camera argument, unless they're looking for a camera that was used to bludgeon someone, how is lying about "you're being filmed" a felony, unless you're being investigated for some weird crime that involves not filming people.
Oh, I know what you mean.
Words is hard!
I guess more normal people can read "parsed words" just fine.
Actually, with RIAA math, you have to recoup 5000 hours, so it took you zero minutes to come up with it.
TL;DR: "MIKE, Y U NO GENERALIZE!"
To paraphrase out_of_the_blue himself: "your problem is that you refuse to generalize."
Blue actually believes that generalizing gives us the right answer. Nuance is non-existent. You can't try things on a case by case basis. Rich people are bad because being rich makes them bad. Anyone who says "some rich people are bad" is an idiot for even considering the possibility of the existence of a non-bad rich person.
It's the same for everything. He probably doesn't like food, or likes all food. Because "some food is bad" wouldn't be generalizing, and blue won't accept anything except blanket statements and generalizing.
I was about to complain about drones being too low but then I took a drone to the knee.
I say we start the official World Please Don't Eat Any Nut-based Chocolate Spread Today Or You'll Get Sued Day. We can put it in any arbitrary date, let's say, February 5th.
"Retired Lt. Col.: Violent Media Has Bred A Generation Of Killers"
Really? I thought the military did that.
*BURN*
You're posting anonymously because you're scared. Got it.
Re: Re: Twice in one piece you warn against surprise.
It surprises me that people respond to _blue with sarcasm.