If a truck runs over a crash victim, and nobody sees it, did the victim really die?
We're in the era of Quantum Police and Healthcare. Officers and EMS workers cannot be observed without being altered.
"The Sanchez bit doesn't mention Google, so I'm going to whine."
FTFY moar.
The files are IN the computer!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkwrIZQDt50
Pavlovian reflex.
We've already been through this.
He didn't fill any of the government provided whistleblower forms nor solicit a whistleblower license. He also didn't use the double-secret special whistleblower handshake, so clearly he isn't officially a whistleblower.
1% relevance
99% hot air
> out_of_the_blue analysis complete
You're lying semantics!
Lying SEMANTICS!
Means using words! Words hard!
Maybe after playing the demo 20 times, it gamevolves into the full game?
They should make a game where the player has to say the most stupidly idiotic backwards religious shit. Then Pat can start playing it and stop bugging everyone else, since it's the "same as real life".
COLLEGE BOY! COLLEGE BOY!
Mike Masnick is such a college boy!
- out_of_the_blue, "Rant against College Boys", 2012
"...you can't have a secret, proprietary law that needs to be purchased."
Hey, it works for the Content Lobbyists... oh, not that kind of "purchase".
Carry on then.
He's been demoted to resident spammer.
It used to be that people always clicked in the flagged comments, to find out what hilarious nonsense was being posted by the trolls.
After this, people will just (rightly) just skip them, as it's likely just more of your spam (which, at this point is just that, it no longer even qualifies as trolling).
So kudos for streamlining the way people use the comments section, I suppose.
Actually, that?s Mike ANSWERING the moral question, with a straight answer, and then saying that it doesn't matter. You just interpret it as not answering the moral question.
"Hey, do you have a car?"
"No, but I don't care, I take the bus."
"You're DODGING the question!"
Yes, keep it up milkboy.
You mean like a mating call?
"Listen, you guys don't care about privacy, so why do you care so much about privacy anyway?"
This is what should happen:
Whenever the press is handed a heavily redacted document, it gets to make up whatever horrible shit it wants that makes the redacter look as bad as possible. Like, "according to my non-redacted copy, in this paragraphs it says 'top NSA officers enjoy clubbing seals and eating kitties'". If the NSA wants to dispute said observation, it has to disclose the actual contents of that paragraph.