He also has an odd skull shape, that means he shouldn't be trusted.
The law is the law! And if it's not the law, it's the law!
You know who else was a gamer?
HITLER.
Coincidence...?
Projecting much? :D
It depends on whether they use laser or thermal printing tho. If thermal, the amount of "ink" doesn't matter, since the paper itself is the "ink".
Yeah, I think the idea is that even if the key is shared publicly, it could be Mega's policy that they never ever look at keys on the net. So even if I put a link in my website and the key alongside it, Mega wouldn't have looked for it so they can say that they just don't know it.
Of course, just like hitting Refresh in your browser is akin to masturbation, hitting Refresh while having unlicensed intentions is more like raping an innocent underage boy!
It all makes sense now.
"Aside from being bullied into it, why should they cut Coulton a check?"
Who said they "should"?
Mike says they'll probably cut him a check.
Because that's the usual way big corps make problems go away.
"So why should Fox cut him a check?"
Who said they "should"?
Mike says they'll probably cut him a check.
Because that's the usual way big corps make problems go away.
Can someone clean up after darryl, please? He's not housebroken yet.
And what does this "settlement" or exchange of coin exactly means to JSTOR or MIT? Either it's a stupid amount that would make Swartz suffer, or is so little as to be a slap on his wrist and mean the equivalent of pocket change?
Why people who get "caught" doing the equivalent of planting a bag of poo in your front door must have some sort of money settlement? Can't they just agree that the action was unwelcome and just promise not to do it again? (which basically is what already happened). Or is it to appease the God of Capitalism, that Coin must grease the Palms of Due Process or something?
I really don't get this point that someone "has" to be punished at all when the parts basically agree not to punish each other (except by involving the Spooks which pretty much everyone agrees was a bad mistake).
Why should he suffer consequences? He had already settled with the "owners" of the data, who just took the data back and pressed no charges.
I don't get the why he must be punished somehow, even if just to prove the point that he was a naughty, naughty boy?
Translation: we worked HARD to bury this guy, and now you have the GUTS to dig him out???
If these files are illegal, why is CBS allowed to own them? Shouldn't they be arrested?
Surely if someone else was in possession of something illegal, they'd be arrested? Why not CBS, if these files are illegal? Why can they have illegal things?
Yeah he was offered protective custody. 50 years of protective custody.
I agree that allegations of file sharing should be punished. We should start by cutting all the funds of all the music labels who make these allegations.
Re: Re: Another Reason to buy games like Minecraft instead
It works offline, it also can connect to servers if they have authentication disabled.