Does the FBI have any credibility whatsoever?
In the Ok bombing, the FBI claimed that traces of explosive evidence were a match for that found in the remains of the truck. Yet the head of the explosives section, Dr. Frederic Whitehurst testified under oath that the testing done by the FBI lab could distinguish between urea found in fertilizer, and that found in urine. Whitehurst also testified that many cases and tests came under extreme political pressure to "show" that the test was positive for a particular person.
Richard Jewel, the actual hero of the Olympic Park bombing, was named as a person of suspicion in that event. Persons of suspicion are not supposed to be publicly named. He won a rather large lawsuit, and of course was innocent.
The anthrax attacks had five people named, one after another, as the guilty party. Again massive pressure and subterfuge was placed in attempts to prove each of these individuals guilty. Ivins was finally pressured into suicide with no real evidence, and the case closed. Ivins was almost certainly not the guilty party, and would have required the help of four or five additional people working for a year to achieve this attack. The NAS (National Association of Sciences) said that Ivins did not have access to the equipment or containment units that would have been required. A bunch of terms, particularly "ultracentrifuge" were bandied about to make it appear as though he was guilty. As a biochemist, I had an ultracentrifuge in my lab section. So did my ex-wife. Big deal, except that it sounds malevolent.
Ivins reputedly used acetaminophen to kill himself. Doing so produces a long and extremely pain full death. Any scientist knows how to commit suicide with little or no pain with common objects found in the home or lab.
How can anyone trust the FBI?
The best comments (excluding the trolls) are those that wander as they will. Serendipity is one of the most wondrous actors in both academia and blogs.
The internet is today's public square. It speaks, and it is easy to guestimate it's truth by at hand research.
The NY Times has finally admitted that the Bush cabal committed torture and murder. They have known this from their readers since the early 2000's. They have known that the CIA and NSA were wire taping the US public since at least 2002, but decided not to publish because it might affect the 2004 elections -- of course it would have.
The present "public square" tries to keep the politicians clean, and there should be more of them rather than less. After all it is more than Sisyphean task to keep this brood of war mongers and thieves clean.
If the US bragged about a cyber attack on NK, NK would have no option but a massive retaliation.
For many it is not the money, but the quality. I stopped watching television at all about 10 years ago. With the box with the most channels, I can find something that justifies my time. Can be enjoyable or instructive.
Of course for many, it is the cost.
Without using nuclear weapons, wars are won on the ground. Vietnam was proof of this. As are Iraq, Afghanistan and many parts of Africa.
North Korea not only has weapons and allies, they have ground based forces trained and disciplined under conditions that 1st world nation forces would not be able to function under.
South Korea left its capital within artillery range of NK -- possibly one of the stupidest strategic decisions since the invasions of Afghanistan by the USSR and the US.
A US Vet.
Cord cutting is not limited to the young. I am pushing 70, and not only have I cut my own cord, I help others to do the same thing.
I start with a demo of the channels available, then show them how to hook up a box, then have them hook up a box, then use a spreadsheet to show them how much they will save.
It is easier with the tech savvy (and there are many -- I had my first programming job in '65) But I also succeed with oldsters who can barely use a point and shoot camera.
How does Rogers even know that NK wasn't attacked in return? Does anyone think that NK would admit it, or that the US would brag about it -- it would give NK an excuse to shell, bomb, or invade SK.
SONY has terrible security, refuses to improve it, and practically invites crackers in.
Worse, Sony has committed massive numbers of rootkit attacks, on audio CDs played on computers, against Americans and others. If everybody whose computer was damaged by Sony, attacked in return, Sony could give up computers for ever.
War doesn't work well for the losers or the winners. Talking, no matter how inane, is a far better solution than destruction, maiming and death.
Just why does this Union head believe that cops know the law any better than pro footballers, or break it less often?
That the law has any meaning anymore? People are beaten and arrested for looking at a cop. If you can't even look at what is in public, without risking a beating, then just what "freedoms" do you have?
We have created reputed rights to all sorts of things, because calling them privileges are said to hurt some peoples self images. I do not question the validity, good or bad of said grants. But making them "rights" are the mechanism by which the real rights as outlined in the Constitution ad its amendments are diluted into meaninglessness.
It is not just OOKLA. The reputed US government broadband site speed test showed TWC running my downloads at 23Mbs when I had only paid for 6. And nothing was downloading as fast as 6Mbs.
I sent complaints over this repeated anomaly to the Feds, but of course nothing happened.
We (law enforcement) wanted to commit this act, therefore it was legal.
I strongly agree that this was a molestation. But the auditors belief that the original should be destroyed is the willful destruction of private property, and illegal.
I am beginning to think that these agencies couldn't find a needle in a needle stack. Are they incapable of understanding the consequences of false positives?
Prosecutors have been known to try more than one person (sometimes at the same time, in the same courthouse,) for the same crime that only one person could have committed.
Prosecutors like to say that they are only interested in a search for the truth, but they are more interested in conviction rates.
Few judges like to be overruled, as it embarrasses them. It is about the only thing that keeps them in line. Impeachment is all too rare.
To work with random bits they would need a hardware random number generator. There is always at least one determinant key for a pseudo random number generator.
As I recall, the FBI said that it was just collecting TOR's data to "have it." A month later they announced they had taken down Silken Road 2.0 by breaking TOR's encryption.
Flood them with one time pad encryptions of work that is out of copyright or otherwise in the public domain. Easily generated in massive amounts.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Botnets
A decent A/V relies not only on viruses, but also on heuristics -- the detection of a program which is behaving in an unusual way. Signatures are not required.
Indeed signatures are often inadequate, as many viruses are created to morph, and change their strings on a regular basis.
I often worked with a virologist who found the homologous behaviors of organic viruses, and those of the electronic world to be fascinating similar.