This fight makes no sense to me. If the cable companies are concerned about revenue, they can just cancel the line item for "equipment rental" and just raise the base fee an identical amount. Boom, done.
If they are worried about losing control... I don't understand why. They own the pipes, so changing which box makes the connection ultimately doesn't alter anything.
If you can't get the content legally, I guess the only option is to pirate it.
The lost Hulu revenue and lost ratings are just bonuses.
I did indeed run into this today.
Forbes can keep their content. How they expect to monetize a site with no viewers might be an interesting subject, but isn't my problem.
Don't forget that employees "let go" in various ways have no income and therefore don't purchase things, which affects all companies.
Could this be a downward spiral that suppresses consumer demand? Nah....
How many is too many, exactly?
I really don't understand all this negativity.
I'm sure that if the MPAA tries hard enough, they can make it so difficult to watch new movies that no one does it.
That could count as a win, right?
Bye-bye pre-1970's music. I'll miss you, but not nearly as much as the recording industry.
Hopefully they're so successful in locking up content that they go out of business.
Not a lawyer, but isn't John talking to the press about a case where he's plead the fifth a bad idea?
You can lead a horse to water...
It's fine.
If the cable providers don't agree with the spirit of the rules, they will just go out of business faster.
You can't force someone to accept help.