There are many Monsanto patents here:
https://register.epo.org/smartSearch?searchMode=smart&query=monsanto
I don't which are the ones in question, I'm afraid.
Interesting - do you have a link for that please?
11 billion figure from here:
http://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2015-02/bnd-nsa-mass-surveillance/seite-2
I've clarified in the headline - thanks.
There are a few areas where standard harmonisation/mutual recognition might be relatively easy - car production is the one that they always cite (in fact, more or less the only one they can ever come up with....) Similarly, removing remaining tariff barriers would be straightforward. But it would be a pretty meagre result.
Thanks, I've made changes to reflect those points.
Thanks, you're right. Foolishly, I took that information from the article, which is wrong....
I think you're right; ridiculous the names of these three bodies are so similar. Thanks.
Thanks; yes, I remember it.
Thanks for the info. So which countries have more flexible interpretations of the EUCD on TPMs?
I didn't want to steal all your thunder...
indeed - thanks for pointing it out, fixed
Thanks, you're right - I've corrected this.
Yes, you're right; unfortunately McKinsey don't break down their figures. I've used some other numbers from the IIPA report: see if they make sense now.
Thanks; I made a slight change to capture that.
I agree it's not at all clear; I suppose we'll only really know once the Belarus government starts enforcing it and we see the practical effects.
Re: Where is your due diligence?
The first paragraph of the Politico article reads:
"EU trade chief Cecilia Malmström said Tuesday the bloc’s pending trade pact with Canada could be done by the end of July, but acknowledged the more controversial EU-U.S. agreement will get pushed to next year."
So she is saying that CETA could be done by the end of July this year, but that TAFTA/TTIP will get pushed to 2016. Later on in the article she says:
"On the EU-U.S. trade deal, which is far less advanced, Malmström acknowledged that it would not be finalized this year, but repeated a goal to get it done by the end of the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama."
Again, that makes it clear that it is TTIP that she hopes will be completed in 2016, unlike CETA, which she still evidently believed could be finished by July 2015.
Finally, a paragraph near the end says:
"The Canadian agreement needs to be translated into all 24 official working languages of the EU before the ratification process in the European parliament could start, which would be in spring 2016 if there are no further delays."
So ratification of CETA was to have taken place in spring 2016, if it had been completed in July 2015, as she hoped it would be.