Someone's sarcasm meter is on the fritz...
Apparently Feinstein is completely blind to the very vocal outrage from some of the largest tech companies around, including Google, Yahoo, eBay, Twitter, Facebook, Mozilla, Wikipedia and more. This is not someone listening to the people. It's someone following the money.
While I agree with your general point, Mike, I find it interesting that in this paragraph, whether intentional or not, it seems you've equated tech companies to people. I guess you agree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC?
If you think that was bullying, you sure are pretty sensitive aren't you, cupcake?
Rubbish. Utter rubbish.
I'm responding to my own post here, just to be clear. I wasn't signed in for the comments in this post.
But to follow up to what I was saying, this is all just part of the ridiculous farce that is our Republican form of government. It's the game they play with rules that have evolved over the past 240 or so years.
Which has me thinking: Hasn't technology gotten to the point to where we can do away with Republican government and go back to a straight up democracy? Forgive this digression, which I'm sure has been brought up before (as nothing is original).
With a majority of the population in possesion of a cellphone and more and more people using smartphones, couldn't we just say that everyone who wants to vote has to do so by a cellphone registered to their SSN? But not voting for elected officials; instead every item that Congress would normally vote on gets voted on by the entire population, including commitee and subcomitee issues.
No more lobbying to politicians. Instead they have to advertise to the public (and you thought campaign ads were bad). A drawback to be sure, but there could be limits impossed.
Tell me why this is a bad idea or wouldn't work. And then tell me how we can make it work.
If they make a movie out of this whole Righthaven thing, they need to get Jack Nicholson to reprise his Col. Jessep role in playing Frederick.
This is another one of those, "Do as I say, not as I do" situations. Our government and it's members do this all the time. Rep. Craig ring any bells?
How long before Righthaven starts bringing these suits in East Texas?
Ahhh. I see I wasn't clever enough to get the joke. I guess since that same joke had been used several times already in this thread I assumed you were being serious. Very good. Carry on.
Aw, man you beat me to it by being brief, and now I look like I don't refresh my page before I post.
Damn! Does Turk handle HTML formating gaffs?
And it's "they're" as in a contraction of "they are."
You're welcome. See it's easy to use contractions. Whoops there I go again.
My presiction is that darryl's head would finnally (sic) explode after seeing the extensive rewrites of his allways (sic) thotful (sic) expositions. But I digress...
The first thing I thought of when reading the last sentence of Mike's post was, "Don't do that, then people might actually think Darryl has cognitive reasoning!"
Of course, people who are rabid advocates of elitism...
You mean like Ayn Rand?
I wonder if Lady Gaga would sue if I started a band named "The Gaga's"?
Yes.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110308/03390313399/lady-gaga-claiming-ownership-gaga-threatens-baby-gaga-ice-cream.shtml
You didn't cite your original sources, but if they are more legitimate than Weird Al's own blog about the story, please enlighten all of us.
Snark much? To quote The Big Lebowski:
Walter: Am I wrong?
The Dude: You're not wrong Walter. You're just an asshole.
Well I for one will be boycotting the upcoming Twilight movie. Not necessarily because of Summit's douchebaggery, but more because I'm not a tweenage girl.
Most artists don't have a problem with the exposure so long as they are credited. Why can't musical artists get the same courtesy?
They do. In the liner notes of the album. You just don't hear that on the radio, or mp3 gotten off of Limewire.
The RIAA should take their act on the road. I am sure as a comedy tour, they would rake in some serious cash.
They wouldn't (couldn't?) do any worse than Charlie Sheen.
Re: Re: Re:
It's obvious he hasn't read it. Anyone that actually takes the time to read it immediately understands that Google, Masnick, et al are all lying about how bad it supposedly is.
I wonder how much in donations Jimmy Wales was promised if he took the site dark; I know they've really been hurting for money recently.
Wow. That's a lot of bullshit for one short post.
So your defacto arguement is, "If you dissagree with PIPA/SOPA you haven't read it as no one upon reading it could have any issues with it." What a crock. Come up with a real arguement and get back to me.
And if Wales wanted to line his pockets he'd take the easy money and side with the **IA's since they're the ones throwing cash at anyone who will support this horrible, horrible bill.
Troll hard, retard.