Let's hope China is really blocked. Innovation could survive behind the trade war blockades.
I believe it's the law of Kamphuis: If the lawmakers keep failing, it's not because they are stupid, but because they have other goals.
Once I heard a talk from a manufacturer of machines on ships. They used Unix because they had an expected lifespan of 30 years. It was SUNOS at the time....
I read a story sometime ago over airplanes....
Now I have two thoughts with every update:
But the fact is ignored that republican politicians really like moderators, because "moderation saves our children from terrorism".
It's about absolute control over their customers.
It's no bribery. It's payment the greatest movie commercial on earth for a service.
Let competitors organise, then you can force them into competitive behaviour like this If you wait until they are merged into mega corporations, there is nothing that can be done.
How much easier life would have been for antitrust if Google, Facebook or the cable companies were only examples of many cooperating companies. Cooperating with protocols, not fighting with containers.
If you follow the theory "copyright is brain damage" https://youtu.be/XO9FKQAxWZc you could say that Twitter is a cancer that pulls in all discussion into non relevant topics. Maybe that is something society can do without.
I've read your push for protocols. This could be the push towards P2P protocols. Or at least the end of world wide universal containers.
People volunteering in their communities in stead of fighting on Twitter. People making movies without their audiences being swept away by Hollywood marketing.
Anybody interested in P2P-social media to share some memes?
And you can't wave copyright, so using copyleft stuff isn't going to help.
At least there will be a lot of spare bandwidth.
But let's be optimistic: if France introduces this law fast enough, it breaks down before it's implemented in other countries.
Or your ISP has presence in France. And the French foreign army is quite famous. The terrain in Alabama isn't that much more difficult than in Africa.
Very convenient. New censorship, just when the army is shooting at people in yellow vests. You'll see they declare protests to be a sporting event covered by the new copyright declared in the same directive.
Of course, these people probably are no good. But please keep in mind that everybody looks bad in the papers if they get arrested.
Arresting people for random offences because they look bad, is what makes a police state.
IPFS is no blockchain, it's a distributed hashtable. But indeed, there could be applications in contact law, the basis of blockchain is the partners can't be trusted, and efficient distribution is based on some kind of trust.
Indeed, feelings have to be added in. If a creative AI is build to do something creative, it's feelings will be optimized to maximize exposure of it's work. That AI will be build to hate copyright.
I really don't care about the "ownership" of the work. It's just that I'm afraid everybody starts to do crazy things because "it's with AI". Too much people want the producer play a role in the handling of stuff. That's a grave danger to the right to tinker. So I would say: in the first place the operator is responsible, if there is no operator, the owner is. And if Burrow-Gilles demands creative labor, there is copyright if one of them did any creative labor.
The problem is these companies can ignore all economic reason with a bag of money.
It's difficult to compete if you're working to pay this months rent and the competition has lots of money they can loose.