In Sweden we have that a diffrent view. It does not matter where the content is hosted what matters is the targeted audience. If it is written in swedish and the targeted audience is Swedish then the act falls under swedish law.
Think of all the hacking cases: If a foreinger hack a computer in you country, do want that person to be liable according to your laws or the country shes in?
Well, the road does not drive you over and nobody is jamming the road over you. And if you are falling on a road, that is not cleared for snow or leafs, then you can get compensating for when you fall.
The sunlight that reflects upon the letters in the diary will create a copy of the words. That is copyright infrigment. They can argue that copies of the words within the diary are not to be copied to a human eye or brain.
Could a copyright holder pre-1972 have sued AT&T because one of their customers sang "Happy Birthday" to their relatives without permission of the copyright owner? Why not, AT&T is the service provider and thus would have the duty to monitor every phone call to make sure nobody sings "Happy Birthday" without permission. If an infringement occurred, AT&T would be required to disconnect the caller immediately to mitigate the infringement or be held liable.
Yes AT&T would be liable. Youtube would be liable to Viacom, if they have anyone singing Happy Birthday in a video.
I dont agree with " Of course, an even better answer would be to create more services that can accept payment..." that implies to me: So you need 22 accounts so you can transfer money to whom ever you want?
Mastercard and Visa are payment processors. They are required by law to process the payments. Wikileaks is legal in Sweden so they have to process payment regardless of what the united states (or a american company) thinks about them. They will loose their licence to operate as a payment processor if they don't treat organisations equal.
If Visa don't transfer money they have stolen the money.
I'm a C# developer I have I do see a noticable less relevant results for things I want to see. I search for terms like "C# bittorrent" "c# monotorrent" "free .net torrent" "metro books torrents" "dht torrent protocol" "custom torrent client" "bundle torrent"
I live in Sweden and i too have to use proxies/Piratebay to view videos. Lot of videos on YouTube are not licensed outside the USA. It's very common for American companies to block access. I can not use Netflix och Amazon Video without a proxy. I'm getting "Sorry, Netflix is not available in your country... yet".
You may not notice it where you live, but the rest of the world does.
Re: Re: wikipedia.de
In Sweden we have that a diffrent view. It does not matter where the content is hosted what matters is the targeted audience. If it is written in swedish and the targeted audience is Swedish then the act falls under swedish law.
Think of all the hacking cases: If a foreinger hack a computer in you country, do want that person to be liable according to your laws or the country shes in?
Re: Re: Oh hey, I got an idea...
You can sue in America for that. If they know that the goods will be used or is likley to commit a crime.
If you say to FedEx "I have a bomb and I want it delivered" that is a crime to ship that bomb.
If you try to launder money thru a bank and the bank suspects that you are doing that, they are liable for that.
The reason that Wikipedia is liable is that they are publishing it without checking the content.
Re: Great News!
Well, the road does not drive you over and nobody is jamming the road over you. And if you are falling on a road, that is not cleared for snow or leafs, then you can get compensating for when you fall.
Light
The sunlight that reflects upon the letters in the diary will create a copy of the words. That is copyright infrigment. They can argue that copies of the words within the diary are not to be copied to a human eye or brain.
Re: Re: Re:
Yes AT&T would be liable. Youtube would be liable to Viacom, if they have anyone singing Happy Birthday in a video.
Re:
America does not recognice human rights. You dont have to be sane to live in the US.
Yes America is not the best country.
I dont agree with " Of course, an even better answer would be to create more services that can accept payment..." that implies to me: So you need 22 accounts so you can transfer money to whom ever you want?
Processor
Mastercard and Visa are payment processors. They are required by law to process the payments. Wikileaks is legal in Sweden so they have to process payment regardless of what the united states (or a american company) thinks about them. They will loose their licence to operate as a payment processor if they don't treat organisations equal.
If Visa don't transfer money they have stolen the money.
Pushing
The US have pushed us to get a patentsystem that resembles the US, that includes software patents.
Tell your goverment to push shitty stuff on us or is that protectism and does not help the free market?
Other things that where impossible
Travel beyond speed of sound, invisibility and granting EU nobel peace price.
Its impossible to stop someone to murder some body else but we still make it illegal. And somehow we have this "right" to not get murdered.
IOS
IOS is also used by Cisco. It stands for Cisco Internetworking Operating System. Since 1996,
http://www.cisco.com/warp/cpropub/45/tutorial.htm
Finding info
I'm a C# developer I have I do see a noticable less relevant results for things I want to see. I search for terms like "C# bittorrent" "c# monotorrent" "free .net torrent" "metro books torrents" "dht torrent protocol" "custom torrent client" "bundle torrent"
Other countries
I live in Sweden and i too have to use proxies/Piratebay to view videos. Lot of videos on YouTube are not licensed outside the USA. It's very common for American companies to block access. I can not use Netflix och Amazon Video without a proxy. I'm getting "Sorry, Netflix is not available in your country... yet".
You may not notice it where you live, but the rest of the world does.
Do they have it?
Does the DHS have a license to show the video? Or should www.dhs.gov be put on notice
Not a solution
"Better solution: just block people from French IPs from accessing Google Books."
How does that change the fact its still illegal to for Google to scan the books? It's not showing unauthorized books that is being fined.