True. But eventually it will penetrate their thick skulls, when twitter, facebook and the like are shot down or hobbled...
Well, the upside is that if these people pretend there's no problem until it's too late... then they're going to go ape the moment it DOES go too far. Hello, mass riots.
But I bet they don't know what the effects of those effects will be.... it involves the people getting ANGRY. And staying that way.
Well, UMG commanded the DOJ to attack, and they don't wanna wait!
Don't forget "Peter Pan" and "Treasure Island." The only NON-public domain work I can remember them churning out is "101 Dalmations," which is loosely based on a 1956 book. (And of course, they like people to believe THEY came up with it, not Dodie Smith)
Yeah, the only original content to come out of Disney is from Pixar.
I just had a nerdgasm over that quote.
But yes, it's totally true. I bet theaters had exactly this reaction when movies showed up...
No, we aren't forced to watch their movies. But if we don't, they blame piracy and sic the government on our freedoms.
Another way in which Hollywood refuses to acknowledge how the Web works - they think news of this can't/won't spread, and nobody will notice their blunders.
"The MPAA needs a reformer, one who helps guide Hollywood into the opportunities of a new market place."
Sort of like the Mafia needs a reformer.
Read this: http://www.catherynnemvalente.com/fairyland/about
Hugely flawed argument. And I would rather have a future filled with cover bands than no free Internet.
And you're just perpetuating the usual lies that the big corporations are feeding you. It's been shown that lots of "nerds" DO buy content, but they don't want to just blindly gobble up the crap the dinosaur old media produces.
Oh, and piracy is possible WITHOUT the web. I once gave a friend a burn of three CDs I owned and paid for, so he could see if he liked the bands. Guess what: HE BOUGHT THE CDS HIMSELF, and some bands got a new fan.
Here's another example of consumer AND artist-friendly distribution that grinds the big corporations' gears.
http://www.catherynnemvalente.com/fairyland/about
And you know what? That book she allowed people to pay their OWN price for, it's her best-selling book in hardcopy to date!
So you're saying you're opposed to fair use, or even having a song playing somewhere in the backgorund while you record a baby dancing. We should never use pictures from an anime as our icons, we should never allow bakers to produce cartoon "picture" cakes, and we should simply bend over to our corporate overlords.
And yes, they ARE interfering with our free speech. YOU clearly don't "Get" free speech, because if you did, you would see that any bill that gives a kill switch for any website will be abused.
I meant to say "Tyrants never win."
"I dont even think you are in the game, or know what the game is.."
Spoken like a true shill, my dear.
In the long run, we won't lose. Because tyrants never do.
Oh, they're much better suited to the job than the turds in office, who can't tie their shoes.
They simply don't want to jump into all the muck, especially since "ordinary people" no longer get elected. You need to be ridiculously rich to win.
So do you seriously think that the government won't swoop in and conveniently "find copyrighted material" whenever people on a site (like this one) say something they don't like?
Of course they will. Whenever the government does ANYTHING it's for it's own purposes.
Re:
Indeed. I think the thing is, they didn't expect the commonfolk to get onto it and use it for their own ends. Nor did they expect the commonfolk to become tech-savvy enough to build their own, if need be.