That seizure is suspect . Prior restraint is to stop speech before it is printed. Secret indictments in a copyright infringement case. Yeah right. No copyright infringement. No answers . Was it mr plum in the ballroom with a candlestick? Think about those clues and u will have ur answer. I also don't think that RIAA was not initiating party, I think there was a play to shut down speech, and RIAA is there partner washing each other's hands. DHS needed excuse to suppress speech and RIAA gave it to them although innorrect. DHS and FBI now control the Internet. Completely , real time, the search returns can be distorted . An answer from a computer is only as good as the information being put in. The human mind is similar. The lies and abilities of these agencies would shock u far worse than what Snowden put out there.the inequalities and discrimination that can be produced by this far outweigh anything else and needs to be discussed publicly.
It wasn't a copy paste error. A blog was seized . On bogus copyright infringement charges, and court proceedings done in secret. At the time, the government was using prism for upstream surviellance. Directly tapping into the backbone of the Internet for access. In a blog people convey ideas through printed words. The government did not like the words , and didn't want people to see those ideas. RIAA was working so closely with government at the time, so they looked to them for a legal excuse to shut the speech down. RIAA said sure we will find you're copyright excuse, so shut it down. They never got the excuse right. The content of the speech was protected . It was about cointelpro, civil rights, and what the government was doing at the time. The spying and how they were tapping into the net, ect. What was written had a reference to a rap song, that the name alone could , could have been adjudicated possibly as not protected speech. The government didn't want people to hear this because it was before Snowden. So they shut it down figuring they could deem it unprotected speech , or part of a criminal copyright act. Shutting down speech before a judge can decide if it is legal, is called prior restraint. The Supreme Court and everything in the American legal system frowns upon prior restraint. It caused warning bells to go off because copyright law was being used to quell dissent , a fundamental no no in free America. Not to mention how the patriot act was overbroadly being used to tap into net. They didn't understand the law they were using to stop the speech. They were so used to interpreting and using the law to do whatever they wanted . You can bend things , but that would have completely broken the "free society" that we supposedly still have.
I know why the blog was seized. It was done to exercise a prior restraint on speech about cointelpro . RIAA was just used to give them their bogus reason to keep the comments censored. The motivation was censoring speech that was trying to warn people about the level of spying going on and how it was being used to control dissent. This was before Snowden, so this warning would have raised questions. They were doing whatever they wanted and trying to justify it later, they screwed up big time, jumped the gun, and hid it . They thought they could justify it one way and then tried another to no avail. I hope someone can use this info to expose the real truth.
My experience, being mocked, is that the cell site simulator is old news. About three to four years ago , they were able to change the data they intercepted to mock me real time. They can now omitt data and add fake data real time. Access can still be denied through site simulator and calls and connections can be dropped, but the new technique allows for censoring incoming data and outgoing real time.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Electromotivegirl.
Seizure was example of censorship
That seizure is suspect . Prior restraint is to stop speech before it is printed. Secret indictments in a copyright infringement case. Yeah right. No copyright infringement. No answers . Was it mr plum in the ballroom with a candlestick? Think about those clues and u will have ur answer. I also don't think that RIAA was not initiating party, I think there was a play to shut down speech, and RIAA is there partner washing each other's hands. DHS needed excuse to suppress speech and RIAA gave it to them although innorrect. DHS and FBI now control the Internet. Completely , real time, the search returns can be distorted . An answer from a computer is only as good as the information being put in. The human mind is similar. The lies and abilities of these agencies would shock u far worse than what Snowden put out there.the inequalities and discrimination that can be produced by this far outweigh anything else and needs to be discussed publicly.
Re: Blog seizure
It wasn't a copy paste error. A blog was seized . On bogus copyright infringement charges, and court proceedings done in secret. At the time, the government was using prism for upstream surviellance. Directly tapping into the backbone of the Internet for access. In a blog people convey ideas through printed words. The government did not like the words , and didn't want people to see those ideas. RIAA was working so closely with government at the time, so they looked to them for a legal excuse to shut the speech down. RIAA said sure we will find you're copyright excuse, so shut it down. They never got the excuse right. The content of the speech was protected . It was about cointelpro, civil rights, and what the government was doing at the time. The spying and how they were tapping into the net, ect. What was written had a reference to a rap song, that the name alone could , could have been adjudicated possibly as not protected speech. The government didn't want people to hear this because it was before Snowden. So they shut it down figuring they could deem it unprotected speech , or part of a criminal copyright act. Shutting down speech before a judge can decide if it is legal, is called prior restraint. The Supreme Court and everything in the American legal system frowns upon prior restraint. It caused warning bells to go off because copyright law was being used to quell dissent , a fundamental no no in free America. Not to mention how the patriot act was overbroadly being used to tap into net. They didn't understand the law they were using to stop the speech. They were so used to interpreting and using the law to do whatever they wanted . You can bend things , but that would have completely broken the "free society" that we supposedly still have.
Blog seizure
I know why the blog was seized. It was done to exercise a prior restraint on speech about cointelpro . RIAA was just used to give them their bogus reason to keep the comments censored. The motivation was censoring speech that was trying to warn people about the level of spying going on and how it was being used to control dissent. This was before Snowden, so this warning would have raised questions. They were doing whatever they wanted and trying to justify it later, they screwed up big time, jumped the gun, and hid it . They thought they could justify it one way and then tried another to no avail. I hope someone can use this info to expose the real truth.
Cell site simulators advancing
My experience, being mocked, is that the cell site simulator is old news. About three to four years ago , they were able to change the data they intercepted to mock me real time. They can now omitt data and add fake data real time. Access can still be denied through site simulator and calls and connections can be dropped, but the new technique allows for censoring incoming data and outgoing real time.