Sure, I'll indulge you techies for a bit.
What is Q Anon?
According to the FBI, Q Anon is a domestic terror threat... https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-documents-conspiracy-theories-terrorism-160000507.html
“[QAnon] posts classified information online to reveal a covert effort, led by President Trump, to dismantle a conspiracy involving ‘deep state’ actors and global elites allegedly engaged in an international child sex trafficking ring.” [Yahoo News, 8/1/19]”
posts classified information online to reveal a covert effort
FALSE.
“Q” posts on 4chan and 8chan, clues and tidbits, leading people to figure things out themselves.
Nothing ‘classified’. Review Q drops here https://qmap.pub/
Q kinda maps out what's happening behind the msm spin, which is why its gained such a following, and being attacked for it.
"NONE of what he's stated to date has been right as far as I'm aware."
You don't follow Q, so of course, you wouldn't know.
And if you spent less time talking to yourself (here) with your many accounts, you might have a differing opinion.
Because of the nature of the drops (classified?), Q can't spell it out, you have to decipher it, or figure it out, due diligence required.
Examples (found in Q proofs and videos) are:
1) revealing that Obama was 1 of 13 people using Hillary's private server,
2) Firing Rex Tillerson before it was made public,
3) Meeting with NK/Kim when msm says otherwise
Q drops clues to what Trump is doing. I say its about 75% correct, because most of Q's clues seem to pan out, over time
("Future predicts past"?)
However, my biggest criticism for Q would be the times Q has been wrong (misleading). Those are easier for me to remember.
1) declaring the date and time of Hillary's arrest (mis info)
2) that Sessions was doing really good behind the scenes work to flesh out bad actors (mis info)
3) military tribunals are going to start Jan 1, 2019
One can call it intentionally misleading the bad guys (actors) who also have access to the drops. Or just feeding the shills with datapoints to help discredit Q's clues. And there are quite a few shills.
So I'm watching Q, he's right most of the time. It's why they're (DS) trying to shut him down by taking away 8chan's ISPs.
Some call it censorship.
It was really funny when NYT credited 8chan for the Norweigian shooter's manifesto, when the site was down. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/fake-news-ny-times-says-norwegian-terrorist-posted-manifesto-on-8chan-before-attack-except-8chan-has-been-down-for-a-week/
Find out (decide) for yourself whether Q Anon is a LARP, a psyop, or "for real". I've already said my peace about it.
Some of you have also made your opinions clear about Q.
lol, you crack me up. but yeah, you're mostly right.
Trump was a democrat, who went republican to get elected. His previous runs for the DNC nomination failed and already guessed what would happen if he tried again, look at what happened to Bernie. NeverTrumpers on the republican side working with a former democrat just means Congressional gridlock. Can't lock Hillary up because there are favors owed everywhere thanks to payouts from the CF from UraniumOne which benefited Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, Lynch, et al. Brennan and Clapper are even covering for Obama, until Clapper throws him under the bus for the FISA thing. Mexico is paying tariffs (for the wall), China is paying tariffs (for the farmers), walls being built by Army corps thanks to padded Pentagon budget, ACA repeal failed thanks to McCains last minute change of heart. As for the kids in the basement? they were on the island, Comet pizza was the red herring, just because Alefante knew Podesta well, doesn't mean it all took place there. Epstein? well, he's a played card, but more unsealed indictments coming thanks to Chandler and Mack spilling the beans. Very funny insight/spin you have though, keep it up : )
eh...I think this could be another Poindexter move. Can't do it publicly via government project, so take it black. Or just use England's Echelon system, or was it Carnivore. Regardless, can't have it funded by Congress, need it to go black or let FiveEyes scoop it up. not a good thing for Trump to want to keep it funded. Snowden showed us its all captured anyway, even when they (Clapper) say it isn't.
"He’s also pushed conspiracy theories like QAnon, Pizzagate, and the discredited claim that vaccines cause autism. "
uh, yeah. That gives him credibility to me.
QAnon, yeah, he's right about 75% of time. The other 25% when he's wrong, looks like he's intentionally throwing off the black hats to make them show themselves. Pretty darn clear to me, that he's connected closely to Trump.
Pizzagate. yeah, Jeffrey Epstein pretty much proved to me that Alefante and Podesta were creepers. They're all connected and the Miami Herald pretty much exposed Epstein as a child trafficker in 2008. They all know each other.
Vaccines cause autism. You're referring to William Thompsom of CDC withholding the data that supported African American kids exposed to the MMR vaccine had a +30% chance of getting autism? That discredit? Or was it about him apologizing to the Wakefield, the guy that found the connection between gut bacteria and brain issues from a MMR vaxx? They've since confirmed that Wakefield's original findings.
So yeah, I'd say the whistleblower is on point if he's following those 3 points.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Edmund_D.
About Google etal voter manipulation, Per Robert Epstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90y3MmuBZaU
13:08
Talks about how FB can influence the vote.
Was going to tell you about vaxxes and their link to autism, but i'll save it.
For a medical site.
Re: Re:
Sure, I'll indulge you techies for a bit. What is Q Anon? According to the FBI, Q Anon is a domestic terror threat...
FALSE.https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-documents-conspiracy-theories-terrorism-160000507.html
“[QAnon] posts classified information online to reveal a covert effort, led by President Trump, to dismantle a conspiracy involving ‘deep state’ actors and global elites allegedly engaged in an international child sex trafficking ring.” [Yahoo News, 8/1/19]”
“Q” posts on 4chan and 8chan, clues and tidbits, leading people to figure things out themselves.
Nothing ‘classified’. Review Q drops here https://qmap.pub/
Q kinda maps out what's happening behind the msm spin, which is why its gained such a following, and being attacked for it. TRUE.
Lots of posts on 8chan requesting “Q” prove (Q Proofs) that he’s working with POTUS, have been acknowledged by Trump via Tweets and media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKR7Srh3uJI&list=PL1wvr5yRwpxk7z5_P_UIcL8sFXUGjR4kU&index=2
Too many 'coincidences' to be called chance. TRUE.
Part of draining the swamp. Clapper, Brennan, Schiff, Comey, Lynch, Clowns in Action (Mudd), Fake Media (CNN, MSNBC, Fox) The ‘conspiracy’ is the whole Russia Collusion (Hoax), initiated by Hillary after she lost 2016 election, (FISA abuse, Steele Dossier) supported by Obama and his supporters (Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, et al), Clapper turned on Obama by saying it was Obama’s idea to wiretap Trump’s Tower, recall that MSM lambasted Trump for being narcissistic to claim he was being spied on. Too much to get into here.
Probably doesn't make any sense to you anyways. I digress... A quick intro by prayingmedic will tell you QAnon's origins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vYqqH3-xFY
He deciphers Q drops https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic (but a bit too religious for me) Fortunately, he's one of many deciphering Q drops...
X22Report https://www.youtube.com/user/X22Report
SGTReport https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2nQYGjfe9I_tgWpqgJorUg
David Janda https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ-qLG1bdWVrHM-Hu2W73CQ (more into medical stuff) A bunch of randoms in a playlist doing Q proofs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKR7Srh3uJI&list=PL1wvr5yRwpxk7z5_P_UIcL8sFXUGjR4kU&index=2
Some of it is truly a stretch, but some of it is also tough to deny You don't follow Q, so of course, you wouldn't know.
And if you spent less time talking to yourself (here) with your many accounts, you might have a differing opinion. Because of the nature of the drops (classified?), Q can't spell it out, you have to decipher it, or figure it out, due diligence required.
Examples (found in Q proofs and videos) are: Q drops clues to what Trump is doing. I say its about 75% correct, because most of Q's clues seem to pan out, over time
("Future predicts past"?) However, my biggest criticism for Q would be the times Q has been wrong (misleading). Those are easier for me to remember. 1) declaring the date and time of Hillary's arrest (mis info)
2) that Sessions was doing really good behind the scenes work to flesh out bad actors (mis info)
3) military tribunals are going to start Jan 1, 2019 One can call it intentionally misleading the bad guys (actors) who also have access to the drops. Or just feeding the shills with datapoints to help discredit Q's clues. And there are quite a few shills. So I'm watching Q, he's right most of the time. It's why they're (DS) trying to shut him down by taking away 8chan's ISPs.
Some call it censorship. It was really funny when NYT credited 8chan for the Norweigian shooter's manifesto, when the site was down.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/fake-news-ny-times-says-norwegian-terrorist-posted-manifesto-on-8chan-before-attack-except-8chan-has-been-down-for-a-week/ Find out (decide) for yourself whether Q Anon is a LARP, a psyop, or "for real". I've already said my peace about it.
Some of you have also made your opinions clear about Q.
Re: Re: I'm wondering how Google's own words can be biased
lol, you crack me up. but yeah, you're mostly right. Trump was a democrat, who went republican to get elected. His previous runs for the DNC nomination failed and already guessed what would happen if he tried again, look at what happened to Bernie. NeverTrumpers on the republican side working with a former democrat just means Congressional gridlock. Can't lock Hillary up because there are favors owed everywhere thanks to payouts from the CF from UraniumOne which benefited Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, Lynch, et al. Brennan and Clapper are even covering for Obama, until Clapper throws him under the bus for the FISA thing. Mexico is paying tariffs (for the wall), China is paying tariffs (for the farmers), walls being built by Army corps thanks to padded Pentagon budget, ACA repeal failed thanks to McCains last minute change of heart. As for the kids in the basement? they were on the island, Comet pizza was the red herring, just because Alefante knew Podesta well, doesn't mean it all took place there. Epstein? well, he's a played card, but more unsealed indictments coming thanks to Chandler and Mack spilling the beans. Very funny insight/spin you have though, keep it up : )
eh...I think this could be another Poindexter move. Can't do it publicly via government project, so take it black. Or just use England's Echelon system, or was it Carnivore. Regardless, can't have it funded by Congress, need it to go black or let FiveEyes scoop it up. not a good thing for Trump to want to keep it funded. Snowden showed us its all captured anyway, even when they (Clapper) say it isn't.
"He’s also pushed conspiracy theories like QAnon, Pizzagate, and the discredited claim that vaccines cause autism. "
uh, yeah. That gives him credibility to me.
QAnon, yeah, he's right about 75% of time. The other 25% when he's wrong, looks like he's intentionally throwing off the black hats to make them show themselves. Pretty darn clear to me, that he's connected closely to Trump.
Pizzagate. yeah, Jeffrey Epstein pretty much proved to me that Alefante and Podesta were creepers. They're all connected and the Miami Herald pretty much exposed Epstein as a child trafficker in 2008. They all know each other.
Vaccines cause autism. You're referring to William Thompsom of CDC withholding the data that supported African American kids exposed to the MMR vaccine had a +30% chance of getting autism? That discredit? Or was it about him apologizing to the Wakefield, the guy that found the connection between gut bacteria and brain issues from a MMR vaxx? They've since confirmed that Wakefield's original findings.
So yeah, I'd say the whistleblower is on point if he's following those 3 points.