I suppose we'll also report kids as terrorists when they try to sit inside of a Barbie car. They could crush Barbie, y'all! The horror!
Any teacher who doesn't recognize a scale error in a young kid should be thrown out on his/her ear.
I mean, really, guys. Get it together.
Same old victim blaming.
"She's not a virgin, so the rape couldn't have been that traumatic."
It's my effing computer, and I get to control what displays.
My motto, stolen from @pourmecoffee: "I will ruthlessly curate my online experience to selfishly satisfy my own sensibilities and make it fun for me, period."
Nah. They're detecting "video website" + "long connection time/large file/sustained high throughput" = video
Edit: I would not be surprised to learn that the first few MB of each file transfers quickly, and then the throttling kicks in. This would let webpages load quickly.
Nah. They're detecting "video website" + "long connection time/large file/sustained high throughput" = video
"Every copyright must have an author" != "Every authored work must have copyright."
This seems to be a regular theme here, which is to focus attention on idiots who would otherwise be (rightfully) ignored.
OMG, please eliminate that horrible "music." It's off-putting and lasted WAY too long.
$29.99 today on Woot....
Replied to the wrong thread...
THIS is pure genus.
That is pure genus.
PETA is not seeking to extend copyright, they are attempt to extend animal rights.
PETA is a strange animal, if you'll excuse the language. Unlike, say, ASPCA, they are not really concerned about the welfare of animals; rather, they are concerned about whether animals should have legal rights.
I doubt PETA understands what copyright even is... They just want a monkey to "own" "intellectual property."
Top We-paid-a-lot-of-money-to-lawyers-not-to-be-called-a-Lobbyist.
Next up, let's make sure that the police can get into every residence. That's what they really want, right?
Yup. Clearly, it's a suggestion that folks vote with their wallets, not a suggestion that the police deliberately withdraw protection.
...and they're succeeding.
"He" is doing so; the rest of the force appears to be rolling their eyes and politely not pointing out his mental illness....
The focus of the article is clearly "ZOMG! More paranoid, crazy cops!" and the fact that his attitude is not shared by the rest of the police force is buried in the article.
At best, this article is click bait.
Shouldn't the photographer be prosecuted?
After all, he or she took a picture of a (presumably) underage boy's penis and then distributed it.
Whomever is in charge of printing and handing out the programs and fliers should be prosecuted for distributing child pornography.
Riiiiiiight?
Meanwhile, the "victims" of this "crime" never reported the incident, or possibly even noticed. This is like saying "we're all naked under our clothes" and then prosecuting us all for indecent exposure....
Crap. I probably just gave the authorities a new idea on how to conduct warrantless searches.