Chris in Utah 's Techdirt Comments

Latest Comments (683)

• On the post: Lawsuits Over Who Owns Tweets?

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 19 May, 2011 @ 05:41am

  Re: Re: Per Contract law....

  I think the exception may be just that you can divorce your parents.
  
  If your parents are keeping you from running a business IMO that's just cause for me... though in this case I might fight it as a parent for the sure stupidity of the claim.

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 08:39pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  irk. These are all please pay us sites like work at home scams. Attempt again?

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 08:36pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  Score! Ty kindly :)

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 08:03pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  i really like the anime piracy one consider on average for one show I find 4 different sources (on one site). Most with subs/no sub options.
  
  Joe can got an assist on Japanese language software source too?

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 07:47pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  Ah yes the Pro-Life/Pro-Choice debate. Lets Vilify each other(raises hand guilty) so nothing meaningful comes from the discussion.
  
  Point here was that proof right wrong isn't the issue the issue is the proposes effect (if any) and the fallout (if any) is leading to (if any) results... rather than solutions to free-market non-interference any time soon.
  
  Sad it takes 3 little pics for someone to release there work for ANY use including commercial and it only takes one to give someone a monopoly on it. OH and and that monopoly is implied whether we want it or not.

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 07:42pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  :) Thanks

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 07:10pm

  Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  I wish I could post the Fry poster of "I cant tell if he is trolling or just really stupid"

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 07:05pm

  Re: Re: Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  If its so stale care to show me even one demotivational about it?
  
  Maybe entrance in rear at planned parenthood?

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 06:56pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

  Yes tell me how giving something to a friend or even a third party is illegal.

• On the post: Well, That Was Fast: Sony's New PSN System? Hacked!

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 03:59pm

  I think I mentioned this yesterday. Somebody needs to start a PR team in Anonymous to start getting kickstarter pools together for future projects.
  
  Spitball caption on ad:
  Brought to you by the same folks that braught you Climate-Gate. The same folks that filled the need in "Waste 60 bucks on a game I cant demo? FTS" & Sony hacks brings you....
  
  The thing of it is the entertainment value is huge. Think about Hacker(the movie) like competitions on destroying senators that go against he public interest. I distinctly remember if the government fears the people....

• On the post: Google Points Out That PROTECT IP Would Be A 'Disastrous Precedent' For Free Speech

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 18 May, 2011 @ 03:47pm

  Re: NO, IP PROTECT would be distasterous for Google's profits

  /sarc
  Free speech is a meme! Wow, informed memebase!
  
  Google is to monitor all sites it.. I cant even sarc this.
  
  What is it in there business model exactly? I wonder where the smoke is because the other half of that is your actually inhaling it through your anus.
  
  Small business effect? I really want to see how much more copyright does from even considering a new business in a model based on transformative works verses say a big company considering a new venture and then tell me who has the resources to actually get it done.
  
  Cry of free speech? Yes please tell me when.. oh thats right history writes the story of the victors not the ones killed, skinned and quartered. Because nobody wants to think about that right? Normalcy Bias. 100k of them get out of Germany the other 400k get slaughtered thinking, "Nah, cant happen here". Thanks but I'll take the 100k route every time.
  
  I don't even need Murphy's law for this one.

• On the post: France Suspends 3 Strikes Monitoring Following Data Breach

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 17 May, 2011 @ 08:18pm

  I wonder who the PR guys are over at Anonymous because if they keep up the track record (ClimateGate, PS3 & This) they may be able to set up an donation pools like kickstarter for future projects.

• On the post: Doing A Google Search For 'Blonde' A Firable Offense For High School Teacher

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 17 May, 2011 @ 11:19am

  Make him stop!

  All I can hear in my head is
  
  Blonde?
  Dog?
  Bitches?
  Bitches come!
  Anarchy 99!
  
  
  Then I shake myself from chills equatable to somebody walking over my grave and think the penetrator mode binoculars are every little boys fantasy.

• On the post: PROTECT IP Would Gut Parts Of The DMCA's Safe Harbors [Updated]

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 13 May, 2011 @ 08:59pm

  Re: Re: Re: There's only one sure way to deal with this in finality.

  Best comment of the day. Thanks Greevar.

• On the post: PROTECT IP Would Gut Parts Of The DMCA's Safe Harbors [Updated]

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 13 May, 2011 @ 08:52pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

  When ya got the time Anonymous Coward you may want to put in "you have no rights" + George Carlin into your likely proprietary search engine.

• On the post: PROTECT IP Would Gut Parts Of The DMCA's Safe Harbors [Updated]

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 13 May, 2011 @ 08:40pm

  Re: Re:

  compelling story though.

• On the post: The Senators Who Say Merely Linking To Certain Sites Should Be A Felony

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 13 May, 2011 @ 08:21pm

  Re: Letter to my Senator Dianne Feinstein

  not one to usually point out.. wait yes I am.
  
  Your flawed logic in casting a vote just because there doing A to vote either y or z. Look for the X factor and attempt a third. A bit of a suggestion taking a look on Libertarian.
  
  Somebody really needs to go Hacker (the challenges) on these guys, including my own Hatch.

• On the post: The Senators Who Say Merely Linking To Certain Sites Should Be A Felony

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 13 May, 2011 @ 08:07pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Al Franken is another co-sponsor

  Cudos

• On the post: How Adobe Drives Infringement Of Its Products Through Incompatibility

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 11 May, 2011 @ 07:56pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Adobe is now...

  may have been an error in communication and your familiar enough to customize short-commings but makes one wonder wtf your talking about. The closest approximation I can think of is animation layers but that was covered in chapter e071:Choices on Meet the gimp.
  
  Score one up for thinking too much on wtf terminology and not just asking the obvious question what is your definition of action layers.

• On the post: Fortune Decides To Let Everyone Else Get All The Traffic For Its Story On Secrets Of Apple Culture

  

  Chris in Utah ( profile ), 11 May, 2011 @ 05:51pm

  Unless your talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-tail_traffic which kinda explains why companies are in desperate need of tech heads... nice call on that one Mike.

Next >>