Can't they go after the domain name registrar for altering domain name without a proper warrant, etc. Take them to court and then maybe the proper people in the government will show their faces.
All I keep thinking is that the publishers will want to get their sticky fingers all over this.
Someone like Barnes & Noble or Amazon could possibly pull this off with independent writers.
I have never seen a country that gets its members of government so up in arms about everything. I can see the U.S. turning into a dictatorship before long.
Your analogy is good for the OEMs that got sued by Microsoft over Google, I think. I'm wondering if Apple's controlling ecosystems would add yo the defence?
Alright already, how long does it take the DHS to respond? I really want to see how this turns out.
I was thinking the same thing. After that response from Mozilla, they deserve my support.
Did I hear/read stories of the American government forcing the media to keep mum on certain topics.
I love Wikileaks. As long as there's no cable on there about me.
I don't think Android 3.0 on the Xoom was customized by Motorola. As far as I know, Xoom launched with stock Honeycomb.
I bet you Scott Baio was the one who triggered all this. After his failed spin off, Joanie Loves Chachi, his career went down hill.
Wasn't there a case where a guy sitting in his car in the parking lot of Sartbucks using their wifi charged.
Drug companies need protection, but at the same time need incentives. My big scare with drug companies and the drugs that we may need is that they will not develop new drugs if there is no financial gains attached. How many deadly diseases are there for which there are no drugs simply because drug companies don't see any revenue.
I think the best solution is to regulate them.
Yup. Especially for Facebook which tries very hard to make your profile public or will resurrect a deleted message if someone replies to it.
I think TechDirt is referring to the morality of the whole thing and not the legality of it.
Yeah, most music is evil anyway. Just play it backwards and you'll see.
It seems to me that if they really did spend $40-50 million dollars, that it was on a runaway project with no initial requirements, proper assessment or idea what the heck the goal was. While they were figuring this out over weeks of coffee, some cowboy front-end developer implemented the paywall and the big suits were pleased.
Mind you none of the suits have a clue about security or the experience the front-end guy had, It just did what they wanted to do.
What gets me the most is that you've come up with at least 247 reasons why anyone should pay for the New York Times.
Re: Re:
Totally agree. I despise those people who walk into Walmarts with those Star Trek looking ear pieces.