Generally it isn’t. But that also means that if a Black Lives Matter member can be badgered out of their home just as legally.
There's a new type of breathalyzer out there, that detects cannabis metabolites. Those metabolites can trigger a positive result on the thing, up to 28 days after the intoxication effect wears off.
They can't detect actual cannabis intoxication, mind you, just whether someone ingested some in the past month. But a positive result on them is treated by police as proof of DUI.
If she made those statements in court, that's 23 FELONY counts she committed. But she's a cop so it wouldn't further the cause of justice to punish her like one of the peasants would be for the same offense.
Yup. You or I commit 23 counts of filing a false police report, commit a federal felony (false arrest while in possession of a firearm) and aggravated assault while in possession of a firearm (you can't handcuff someone while making a false arrest without committing assault) and we'd be in prison for decades after being denied bail due to the heinous nature of our crimes. Ever wondered what the constitutional protections for due process, freedom from cruel & unusual punishment and being innocent until proven guilty look like? Look no further than how a cop accused of wrongdoing is treated by other cops and the courts. It's only corruption because they reserve that treatment for their own, despite it being mandatory for EVERYONE.
Police departments and unions LOVE to claim that officers like this are just a few bad apples. But what they seem to have forgotten, is that the saying about bad apples refers to what happens if you don't throw out the few bad apples.
You end up with an entire load of nothing BUT bad apples.
Seriously, if obeying and enforcing the law is just too much work for you, WHY are you working in a law enforcement field?!?
No, they don't exist. Which makes actus rea impossible.
Complain to the court and make it a class action. I'm sure the bad company has enough people affected by the outage yet being billed anyway to qualify.
Makes me wonder if any member of the general public -- the owners of the rights to the public domain -- now has standing to sue Universal Music for a copyright violation?
How can something only "may" contain violations, when filing a copyright notice can only lawfully be done (without committing perjury) if you actually have knowledge that it does contain a violation?
Or use a car analogy. Most people understand cars. An API is like the bolts that connect a steering wheel to the steering column. Oracle is claiming that because they used a different size and shape of bolts than anyone else, it would violate their copyrights for anyone to use anything but their steering wheels or steering wheels they have approved in their cars, even if non-approved steering wheels will fit.
If a criminal goes out and mugs someone, and the victim manages to fight back, the mugger is not allowed to claim self defense if he injures his victim in the struggle. He's certainly not allowed to kill his victim and claim self defense.
But here we have cops who are dressed like regular citizens, who illegally entered and didn't bother to identify themselves and then tried to kill their victim.
A court evaluates a self defense plea on the basis of what the defender knew or reasonably thought they knew at that moment. Mr Betton had no way of knowing the home invasion was perpetrated by police, and if he had shot and killed them all it would have been a lawful act of self defense. But those police knew they were illegally entering, they knew they had disguised their status as police, and they opened fire anyway.
What those cops did wasn't self defense, any more than a mugger shooting his victim would be defending himself.
Most people get the meaning of the old story completely wrong.
Yes, Goliath was HUGE for his time (though he'd be short by modern standards). Yes, he was heavily armed and armored, and very skilled with his weapons. But he was heavy infantry, and he issued his famous challenge to other heavy infantrymen.
As soon as David took up the challenge, Goliath was a dead man walking, and he had to know that. But Goliath was more afraid of being seen to back down than death, so he walked to his death knowing he was about to die.
The reason for this is that muscle-powered weaponry has something of a rock-paper-scissors relationship. Infantry beats cavalry, cavalry beats ranged, ranged beats infantry. David was a slinger, which is a highly mobile, unarmored ranged combatant.
Goliath would be unable to catch David in a chase, could only even attempt to attack if David let him. And David's weapon was lethal to Goliath at more than ten times the length of Goliath's spear.
That outcome was never in doubt.
The Constitution prohibits general warrants, as they were one of the worst legal abuses of power in the pre-Revolution USA. I can't imagine that a warrantless search that exceeds the breadth and scope of a general warrant could possibly be more legal than the already-prohibited general warrant.
Given the way this law is being used, a prosecutor could be prosecuted by a cop for putting that cop on a Brady List. Bets on how fast the prosecutor's office gets rid of the law if that ever happens?
If you were correct, then a town or city would be able to ignore county laws. For that matter, a neighborhood within a city would be able to hold a vote and ignore city laws. A household could unanimously vote that city laws don't apply to their house. While it might be a fun idea to contemplate that you could get your wife, children and dog to all agree that none of your household owes any taxes to the city, county, state or nation, it's not likely to end well if you actually tried it.
Computers are extremely good at following orders. Humans are extremely bad at giving orders to computers.
Imagine what would happen if someone were to stand up in the middle of a town meeting -- or the gallery overlooking the Senate -- and start shouting an advertisement for genital enlargement.
They would be escorted out and not allowed back in so long as they insisted on shouting their ads. AOC absolutely could do the same with her social media accounts.
It's not immigration people in charge of copyright enforcement though. It's customs people in charge of keeping illegal goods out of the country -- which is exactly what they're supposed to do, among several other things.
Re: Re:
Whereas in Canada, they can test you up to two hours after you last operated a vehicle, and if you have alcohol in your system -- for example, going home after work, eating dinner 30 minutes after getting home and having a few beers 30 minutes after dinner -- you get a DUI.