Use a whitelist. Block any mail services that are not approved, and do that on devices as well.
It's not that hard in 2014, and makes it even more obvious when people are skirting the laws and best practices.
Hell, it's not even about skirting laws and is more about just how likely these people are to be targeted and get viruses/information compromised, etc. You'd think these people would be vaguely more interested in their own safety and self-preservation.
What? No. The stingray is the "Target Facility". Everyone else just happens to be in the area as they turn it on, duh.
This isn't new, this was obvious from many times prior.
Which is why Gemalto's hack is such a big deal. It's what Stingray uses to operate, as I even noted myself.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150225/07101530138/gemalto-ok-yes-we-were-hacked-yes-some-sim-cards-may-be-compromised-not-because-us.shtml#c133
Maybe Cisco's China part of the organization can sue the US in some twisted form of corporate sovereignty? Then our circle of TAFTA/TTIP/stupidity can be complete!
This is about something more simple: Stingrays. Stingrays notably force cellphones back to 2G, which means they're using the compromised Gemalto information, among others.
So it's not that Gemalto is only open to the NSA (They probably have no idea) but that their vulnerability is what is exploited in stingrays.
See:http://www.oaklandmofo.com/blog/block-stringray-devices
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2600348/mobile-security/are-your-calls-being-intercepted-17-fake-cell-towers-discovered-in-one-month.html
There are no excuses for opaquely stupid business decisions that even trivial common sense would show happen to be stupid.
Yeah, I have to say as soon as I read "terrorists" I read "we're using bullshit to get what we want", because that's what I read any time I hear responses about terrorism when we're talking about both international AND domestic spying.
The more they push her like this, the more likely it is for exactly that to occur.
The humor is that we'll have nobody to thank but Burr for that happening.
Nobody said it does. Crazy simply begets more crazy, especially when you are a situation where you can only see things from a specific viewpoint - everything else then is simply reaffirming your views.
Therefore, there is only one directions thing can go.
Yep. What if you reside in that area? Pretty much outright consumer deception.
Of course 25mb/s is an understatement. 25mb/s upload and download works for one person and all of that person's devices, assuming they have no more than a few.
If you live anywhere with more than one person (say, in a relationship or a family) - 25mb/s is somewhere between unusable and a joke.
Living with my wife and us both being very connected I find even 100mb/s barely adequate and 10mb/s upstream to be an insult.
Latency (if not the kind from pure distance issues) is caused by poor bandwidth management which is caused by poor network management.
It all comes back full circle.
If you want to really not see latency peaks even if your speed is more than fast enough to handle the connection, get a VPN so they can't throttle your traffic. HostVPN is my suggestion.
"this ambiguous legal issue will ultimately be decided in court"
It's not even remotely ambiguous. It's clear as day. If you didn't take the photo, you don't have copyright on it.
what's not clear is why people want to obfuscate the truth and claim the exact opposite as being true.
Cogent is not letting BGP connections saturate. That's not QOS.
QOS is crappy in general and poorly understood by many, but not the same thing.
I thought trolls actually put better effort into what they do? This makes low hanging fruit sound like a compliment.
There aren't a lot of TV sources that aren't conservative/conservative owned.
You have it backwards. the WSJ was never good at reporting.
It's kinda silly. They're trying to extract blood from a turnip. They should target all internet businesses based in the US except oh wait! That would actually be even more of a pain in the ass, wouldn't it.
Blatant moneygrabs are ridiculous.
Re:
I could make a sexually-focused epithet but it's just as entertaining to know that any political figure is basically willing to show that they don't even deserve the ground they stand on, as long as you shower them with money.