I really wonder how Hollywood doesn't get investigated by the IRS for the enormous tax dodge from declaring these losses as well. It's not just spinal tap, our own gov't is being shorted on their own pay.
The NSA doesn't exactly provide benefit - they are a detriment, so why would we want that hot garbage being focused on hamstringing our own country?
I think today they're more like dyin dns. Sucks, though.
I can only think of two possibilities here:
1: Organizations like the MPAA, FACT, RIAA are going fucking crazy over techdirt posts.
2: People really are that stupid.
I'm tending towards it being the former, that this is another form of "Any permissions granted to anyone ever (such as freedom, fair use, etc) is a risk to our own permissions!"
Paypal is someone who nobody should be doing business with. I'm amazed how many people somehow go the other direction and bet their livings on paypal, who at their discretion can basically bankrupt someone.
Shades of PS3 linux. I would expect some lawsuits here once people wise up. Ninja is right on, but then again this is why I'll never buy a console or anything associated ever. The minute you buy a console everything is license/rental.
Could we simply FOIA all CRS research and index it somewhere?
Cable industry simply wants heat off themselves. It's much easier to point at those who you are exploiting and get a focus on them to reduce the focus on your own activities.
If the FBI is all about chasing every lead, why don't we ask them directly what happened with 9/11?
Oh right.
*drops mic*
I think they want to force cord cutting, because every savvy consumer is going to change their plan come January.
I held off on the HBO bundle with comcast for a few months because HBO's product wasn't out yet, but now that it is I'm cord cutting comcast in January myself.
Watch as all the savvy consumers understand that a price change = contract change, and cancel their contracts and/or sign a new contract without TV service (notably without HBO from comcast). From an economic standpoint it'd be cheaper to get HBO from HBO than from comcast.
Bad, bad decision on their part.
There's no lack of understanding. I wasn't meaning to imply 480p as 480x320, I was implying that tablets have a higher resolution than 480p and no even vaguely recent tablet is 480x320 - as in below 480p, aka SD material/vhs quality.
DVD quality is fine on devices that are 480p, but look awful on devices that are 720p or 1080p, depending on size/resolution. Can it work? Yes. As noted, the original anon said they are storing 480p more than using them for hotel wifi - to act like a hotel can't manage to give you 1.5mb/s downstream would only be likely in a poorly mismanaged hotel and/or in the middle of nowhere - and probably nowhere else. Hotels may not be perfect but we're not talking about breaching 150KB/s. I can't imagine a lot of hotels can't manage that. In addition, tmobile's HSPA will easily pull far above 150KB/s (assuming you have signal).
This can't possibly be true. Your tablet is capable of more than 480p, because no tablet is 480x320.
Whether you'll get downscaled because of awful wifi is entirely different, but there is zero truth to "I use 480p by choice".
So there's a lot of sneaky stuff going on here.
What people don't realize is tmobile is capping the speeds at which users can access video. In order to make it "Free for everyone", they are doing things such as forcing video to 480p. Suddenly everyone doing what they did before will be confused why everything looks terrible.
This is, in modern terms, this is explicitly a data cap - which coincidentally and magically happens to be "Turned on by default" in 5 days. Can you turn it off? Yes, but that's not an excuse. Just like what TMO does after you reach their data cap, but now they'll do it for certain services from day one instead of when you reach a data cap. So now, it's not "Capped at usage", it's "Capped for everyone!" (unless you turn it off).
So network neutrality violation? You bet, and an explicit one at that.
Neither. It includes people who aren't comcast customers, who add a zero to the average. They used the same metrics as "passing" a household.
That sounds nice if it actually were something that worked.
In reality, adding new laws won't fix their problems. Even if they ban streaming services entirely new services will immediately prop up to get around the laws.
So, too little too late.
It wouldn't even remotely surprise me if they're being used at every metropolitan train stop in chicago, just to "collect data". I hope someone FOIA's use around Ogilvie and Union Station in chicago.
So what they're admitting here, is that they're stating it's anonymized, but acknowledging it's personalized (and not anonymous?) and thus as far from anonymized as possible?
Whoops.
Re: Precedent ??
unfortunately, this seems very accurate. Everything pretty much points to a downward trend of government steadily reducing accountability for 10+ years.