A brilliant new way of orchestrating a denial of service attack. Just post any link (the cnn.com home page, for instance, or the Apple Store) and claim it is the latest song by U2 - and have the IFPI send a DMCA takedown for you.
"The neighbors left their WiFi open, and thus, by default, it is sending out signals that effectively say "welcome, feel free to connect to this network."
Can I ask a hopefully relevant question: If my neighbors decide to play ball on my yard, does it make a difference whether I have a fence up? I see this as similar - an open WiFi is like an unfenced yard. But that doesn't generally (to me) mean that any passerby can sit down and have a picnic. Or does it (legally speaking)?
I'm pretty sure that Amazon makes everyone use their DRM regardless of whether you want to or not as part of it's terms and conditions for selling e-books.
That's actually not true. Publishers can request that their books be DRM free. But many publishers don't want that either. You know, because... pirates.
Take a look at at Baen and their model - subscriptions that get you 5-6 titles per month, lots of free books in many different formats. Don't meant to promote Baen, but their creative approach has gotten many of my acquaintances to try authors they otherwise would not have.
I believe Netflix still uses the Amazon data center. They could easily copy their stuff to a data center down-under and all the cross-pacific bandwidth issues go away. The content is fairly static (written only once) so making a copy in Australia isn't the problem.
IN an attempt to bring this conversation back on topic - what impact does this have on the Costco/Casio decision a while back? IIRC Casio sued Costco for selling watches that were meant ( & priced) for the European market. Casio claimed (and won) that Costco was infringing because of a small logo on the udnerside of the watch.
Not sure any more if that was Copyright or Trademark but I thought it applied here.