It's called contributory infringement and has been on the books since 2001. sic A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001). Techdirt, please do some research before posting your pro-piracy views going forward. http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat072204.html
Clearly the author doesn't know the law
It's called contributory infringement and has been on the books since 2001. sic A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001). Techdirt, please do some research before posting your pro-piracy views going forward. http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat072204.html
Nice fragment/run on sentence
You really should check out your local community college to tighten up on your English.
"City Of Inglewood Allotted $50,000 To Hire A Lawyer Flagrantly Abuse Copyright Law To Try To Silence A Citizen"