More detail about their sampling methodology:
http://www.people-press.org/methodology/sampling/random-digit-dialing-our-standard-method/
I view with extreme skepticism any survey whose sampling methodology is random phone calling. Anyone with better things to do than talk on the phone to a machine is automatically excluded from the sample.
Why would the placebo effect be stronger in 2010 than it was in 1966? That doesn't make any sense.
"Most people seem to agree that porting a game without the developers' permission is just bad form (at the very least)." -- That's based on common law principles, the same as all copyright: who makes it owns it.It has nothing at all to do with common law principles, and everything to do with common courtesy. And incidentally, the concept of ownership is all but meaningless in the digital realm.
Marked as funny. Parody, right? Great imitation of the regular trolls.
You are referred to post #1 in this thread, by user Rikuo.
Prohibition of photography and sketching is NOT the policy of the Art Institute of Chicago. It was the policy of whoever owned that particular exhibit. Visitors are welcome to photograph or sketch works in the permanent collection.
http://www.artic.edu/visit
Hell, go all the way back to 1976.
Why do you imagine these benefits accrue only to the people of poor countries? America is a wealthy country, but most of its citizens are poor. Many of us also enjoy the fear of speaking freely and of daring to innovate.
Marry me.
The key word being "responsible". Have we seen responsible use of industry at any time in history? My point is that there are perhaps virtues to be considered apart from whether a larger population could be sustained.
This recent vlog entry by Hank Green What's Up with Start Ups might serve as a rejoinder to some of Lanier's fretting. Like Lanier, Green is nonplussed by the ascendancy of certain internet businesses. But I think Green's angle is a lot more cogent, particularly in the wake of Yahoo's recent throwings-around of huge piles of cash.
Thanks for this. I'd wanted to say something about the WPA - in particular the Federal Theatre Project which employed thousands of artists between 1935 and 1939.
Thank you for spreading some of your inimitable sunshine my way. I'd be the first to acknowledge that I should never have existed. I shall take your suggestion of suicide under advisement. Indeed, I probably would have killed myself already if there weren't others who depend on me. However, since before puberty I committed to refraining from reproduction, my too-much-deferred suicide is irrelevant in the long-term to the Earth's problem with human population.
However, I see nothing in your post that has anything to do with the topic of agrarian/industrial duality. Do try to stay on-topic in the future.
Today's population is only sustainable with the help of industrial practices.That's an argument against today's population, not one in favor of industrial practices.
I can assure you I didn't vote for any of the clowns currently spending my tax dollars.
It makes me sad that in your mind all these actions are equivalent.
It's not a situation in which any old sticker will do. It has to match the rest of the page, it has to have the correct name printed on it, and it has to fit exactly over the misprinted name. Oh, and someone has to spend their time placing the sticker.
Re: Erm...I think they DID have permission
I don't agree with your interpretation at all.
PowerPoint is perfectly capable of displaying captions and hyperlinks.