There is a reason nobody I know remotely likes Time Warner. They are a crap company with crap products and most of their own customers would switch in a heartbeat if they had another company that could compete with Time Warner in their area which has been monopolized
DSLReports.com has been on top of these companies lowering their caps to make sure that many more people hit the cap and thus pay more per month
This "Most don't hit the 2 gig cap" line is so bogus and unfactual ESPECIALLY considering how MORE AND MORE are using their products MORE AND MORE
Hell, most of the reasons for using the products MORE is because the companies are encouraging it.
It makes no sense for customers
Got to love those who use the "Freedom of Speech" argument. They think it means they can do whatever they want, whenever they want, however they want
And it doesn't say that whatsoever
I got rid of Hulu Plus as well b/c the difference between Hulu and Netflix was embarrassing. Netflix is the same price yet ad-free and a MUCH better selection
If Hulu wants to stop the terrible reviews, they need to DUMP the Ads for paying customers and increase their selection
Otherwise, more will decide to stay away
I have no problem with these laws The amount of times that I deal with someone going BELOW the speed limit, not going when the light turns green, etc....with people texting....is absurd
How dare we tax something that will be occuring whether we regulate it or not!
We should continue ignoring it and refusing to accept the millions that we would get!
True right-wing style!
To sum up the lawsuits
- They spent 10x what they will receive back
- People hate them more than ever
- Piracy has not been even slightly hurt
Well, brilliant job
Paywalls can in fact succeed if the site is giving unique information that can't REALLY be found elsewhere
I pay for one site b/c it is a unique subject that is close to my heart. So, I pay for it b/c I can't really get the indepth knowledge elsewhere
But general news sites thinking that we will pay for blogs that provide nothing IN DEPTH is....idiotic at best
This idea of capping people is an absolute joke
If companies want to be extremely high caps, I guess I am fine with that but now we have companies giving caps that even email-checking users can hit with a few youtube-HD vids or Netflix
Their excuses are an even bigger joke
Don't speed and you won't be caught
It really is that simple
The lack of accountability is shocking
Rather than not speeding, people are crying about getting caught and how it should be someone elses problem
No, keep it but for god's sakes, make it smaller by just putting KNOWN terrorists on there and not this laughably big list with who we THINK may be
And there is very little reason to think that this will really change in the near future
The corporations will pay through the roof to keep their interests at the top of the DC wish list
Pathetic but normal
People don't care whether one actually exists.......they heard it on Fox News and therefore it MUST be true
The fact that people can't actually read what is in the bill is pathetic but pretty much sums up the IQ of the right
Rather than simply doing better work, she will now be known as a doctor who got terrible reviews AND I am sure many will now hit her up with worse reviews simply for suing online commentators
It seems impossible to 'stop' people from downloading songs but I am sure there are sensible ways to regulate it and/or get people to legally download songs/cd's.....
Suing grandmothers and children for millions is not one of them and to THINK that that is a way to move forward....shows the true stupidity of those in the RIAA
Their iPhone app is incredible too
I look at it daily
I agree that the law sounds too broad but I also applaud the state for trying to get the internet under control mocking wise
Many stories of kids being tortured online is heartbreaking
I hope kids understand that they cant do anything and get away with it
To this day I wish we allowed most winners to get their lawsuits paid for by the losing side
This would stop MANY people from filing ridiculous suits
Eh, some of that could be private information that is not supposed to be public
Does seem a bit intrusive, imo
If it is done on purpose to make the person look bad, of course
If not, then no
It seems clear to me that people editing things to say something wrong AND with the intent of making the person look bad....is and should be clearly illegal