A design like that may have the unintended side effect of making data potentially inaccessible to all countries.
At the time of a law enforcement request, Google doesn't know where the data is located. Therefore, it's a crap shoot for law enforcement to try to get a foreign law enforcement agency to cooperate.
This is superior to Microsoft's approach. Microsoft knew the data was in Ireland. Microsoft argued that Irish law enforcement could require Microsoft to produce the data.
With Google's approach, law enforcement doesn't know what jurisdiction to cooperate with to produce the data. This could get national jurisdictions into a pissing match.
The FBI could try to get all jurisdictions where Google data centers are located to all simultaneously serve a warrant for the sought after data. But that is a much higher bar to jump over.
For awhile the excuse was: Windows 8 my homework!
Yep. The best way to get rid of bad laws is to enforce them.
Or bad court rulings.
There should be an ambassador to the cyberz.
It would be funny, amusing if Cyberspace eventually gets some sort of de-facto recognition, even if there is no organized government of it.
I'm not sure what you're asking for.
A few years ago, we went in to cut our cable off completely because we were already on the lowest tier. They said that there was an even lower tier that they didn't advertise. So we got that for a couple years. Eventually we cut even that off. We discovered that all we really watched on cable was the evening news ABC / NBC / CBS. Everything else was Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, Starz, HBO, PBS, YouTube.
Although my cable market area is not afflicted with Comcast, I would say: go ahead Comcast, but it's too late. I already cut the cord.
True. The integration of the blinker chip, crystal oscillator and LED onto a single board sure beats separate components such as a 555, an LED and a couple other parts.
Yes, that is true. A Pi to run higher level powerful abstractions. Micro controllers like Arduino to manipulate the physical world. Connect them all together with I2C or other means.
But on the other hand . . .
In 2030, if you want to blink an LED, it will take terabytes of code, including an Arduino emulator in interpreted python on Linux in another emulator. It will be the only option on the market for blinking an LED. But hey, it will be in a SOT-23 package, draw nanoamps, and cost five cents.
Or he is 'smart' and earning extra money on the side.
But if that is the case, he isn't so 'smart' as he thinks. And what value and favor he accumulates may not be so safe as he thinks.
That is the attorney general's way of getting a headline. Filing a lawsuit.
A legislator's way of getting a headline is to redefine broadband so that the lower speeds now qualify and proclaim how many more people now have broadband.
If you want to blink an LED, then a Raspberry Pi is the way to go!
Or, use a full blown tower PC with a serial or parallel port. It is possible in software to control the output of one or more pins of a serial or parallel port in order to blink an LED.
It's the Best idea if the goal is censorship.
Having a government agency regulate journalism is a great first step.
But I am perplexed why this would fall under the FTC? Can't Trump sign an executive order to create a newly formed Ministry of Truthiness?
Let's not forget Parallel Construction. A conspiracy of prosecutors and law enforcement to commit perjury by lying to the court and the defense about what their evidence actually is.
Just avoid looking for BMW keyfobs.
Based on what I've seen BMWs have way too many engineering problems. Turn signals never seem to work. Acceleration control problems when the traffic light turns green. Various control problems cause BMWs to follow too closely or swerve into other lanes. Especially carpool lanes or the road shoulder followed by sudden uncontrolled acceleration. They should all be recalled as unsafe.
Accelerating toward a police state. With nobody to stop them, they can ignore FOIA. They can demand whatever information they want. Maybe they can even ignore the constitution. After all, who will stop them?
You agree to be satisfied or pay $2,500.00 each time that you say you are not satisfied.
Are you saying there are customers who are NOT being screwed over? :-)
In addition to skipping articles or going to another site, people can create their own site.
The Internet has given a printing press to anyone who wants one.
Having one's mouth stapled shut does not prevent one from tweeting new, unreviewed, US policy on the spur of the moment.
Sometimes facts facts must be formed to fit the mold of an agenda.
Re: Distributed File Systems
Let's talk about data blocks. Consider plaintext data block A.
B = random data block
C = A XOR B
Now delete A. A can be reproduced with C XOR B. But neither B nor C are plaintext. Now store B and C in different countries, on purpose. (Note you could XOR with multiple random blocks so that there are three or more parts that must be recombined to reproduce block A.)
Now to reproduce block A, at least one block is required from a foreign country.
Blocks could be stored in multiple countries such that if some number of countries are inaccessible, all necessary blocks can still be retrieved to reproduce the original data.
This helps make data big-brother proof.
Note that you don't need quite as many random blocks as you think. Block B could be used again on some other customer's data block somewhere. Just don't use it too often. It still needs to be a drop in the ocean of random data blocks.