A chemical test distinguishes the presence of a chemical.
It does NOT distinguish how the chemical got into the sample. Either through perspiration or adhesion from a surface you touched.
TFA gave me the impression the test is sensitive.
Prescription narcotic pain killers will make you test positive on opiates. Even if you've refilled and taken them for occasional use for a decade. Even if you don't have a dependency, even a tolerance, let alone not having an addiction. And are responsible in the use of such drugs.
let's talk about the term non-invasive.I would rather talk about the term false positive. 2.5% may not sound like much. Unless your test result happens to fall into the false positives and your life and career are destroyed by overzealous cops who were kind enough not to just shoot you on the spot -- uh, because of um, something. We're talking about an extremely sensitive test here. What if you test positive because your fingerprint ridges have some illicit drug that you happened to pick up by merely handling currency. Oh, wait. Only criminals use actual cash which is anonymous. Law abiding citizens have no need to be anonymous and would know that all good people do not use cash so that their entire life is open to inspection to the government. For their own good.
I guess that all makes it okay for the FBI to do it since it's been done before.
However, I wasn't talking about censorship. Rather, about snooping, and other abuses that lead to distrust of government TLAs.
The leaders of tech companies don't see the darkness the FBI sees.
Comey has it backwards.
The leaders of the tech companies, and their customers, look at the FBI and see the darkness. As only one example I will point out Aaron Swartz.
And it has gone on a long time. And not just the FBI. Go back to the early 1990s, look on Wikipedia for: "Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service". This was partly responsible for the founding of the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation).
Even in the early 1990s there was an ongoing War On Encryption. Encryption was classified as a munition and could not be exported. People wondered if you bought a book at Borders Bookstore on Encryption, and carried such a book with you out of the country, if it would be seen as a munition. It was pointed out that this was perhaps the best way to "export" crypographic technology. Also, if the US was to mandate weakened encryption, or the famous "Clipper chip" (government escrow decryption keys) that the rest of the world would move on to secure encryption, and US companies would be at a competitive disadvantage. Eventually, the government came partly to its senses and simply limited exported encryption to use short weak keys.
But here we are again. It is the same issues. And for the same reasons. The government wants to be able to abuse power, snoop on anything, anywhere, without a warrant, or any kind of supervision. Comey's talk about judicial warrants is disingenuous at best.
A monkey cannot own a copyright.
But a jackass can be elected president.
It seems to me there was this guy Aaron Swartz. He downloaded documents that were available to visitors at MIT. He was maliciously prosecuted and committed suicide as a result. Perhaps that is what the Canadians are hoping for.
IoT is the suffix of Id.
Not only should that high rollers database had authentication and encryption, it should have been ON A DIFFERENT NETWORK.
Please don't call him names back. This is America, where violence is the only proper response to any slight.
There is no problem so great that it cannot be fixed by adding more government regulation.
If some people independently maintain archives of the forgotten things, but not made publicly available. At some future point, and possibly sooner than you think (like 20 years) and those materials are made available online by multiple sites, it will sure make fools of those who wanted the facts to be forgotten.
When you get a Right To Be Forgotten takedown notice, maybe that takedown notice also should have a right to be forgotten?
Which would do better on an intelligence test? (Or even Turing test)
Which is more sane? Like a stable genius.
Also ask . . . do you also have direct knowledge that the parents are not taking their kids to a DIFFERENT dentist? And that they do not intend to get their kids any kind of dental care?
I am anxious to see the positive effect this letter is going to have on this dentist's business. I'm sure parents are very enthusiastic about using this particular dentist now that this letter has been sent.
SESTA can be fixed, in the same sense that you take your dog or cat to the vet to be "fixed".
Decades ago I played violent games like Frogger or Galaga, and I haven't killed anyone . . . yet.
Re: Another blast from the past...
If you don't like my ad blocker, then block me from your site.
I will get the message and I won't come back for at least one quarter of a galactic rotation.