I think the most accurate correction would be to write it as "...and that it will treat them as adults."
Most university students are old enough to legally be considered adults in this country. I'd rather treat them as what they already are.
Sorry for the nitpicking about language. But here is one of the few times I think the choice in language makes a difference.
Just a friendly reminder that, like the Iranian government there are religious fundamentalists with tremendous clout with our own government (or are elected officials in our government) here in the US who would like to muck with the Internet because of content that's an affront to their religious beliefs.
I'm going to take a page out of the gun debate here:
"Access to gigabit fiber doesn't cause piracy, people cause piracy!"
Maybe this is why Comcast and TWC are so reluctant to upgrade their broadband networks; they're just looking out for their buddies in Hollywood!
Once again we see the failure of throwing money at entrenched actors (we don't seem to learn from this do we?). It would be nice if we could either eliminate this tax loophole or modify it to include a clawback provision if broadband investment falls short of what's expected.
Patent nuclear warfare is such a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
So would Techdirt's 'Anonymous Coward' "account" be considered a Burner?