Good. The more pushback against the claim of a 100-mile "Constitution-free zone" at the border, the better. And speaking of borders, James Risen documents a great incident of civil disobedience re: border crossings that occurred a few years back at the VT-Canada border.
"Barry Eisler, you've disclosed Sensitive National Security (TM) information! I must now prosecute you under the Espionage Act!"
I recognize that some people like to get into tech fanboy wars: iPhone v. Android, Mac v. Windows v. Linux, Playstation v. Xbox, etc. That's going to happen, even if it mostly seems like a waste of time.Here, let me give the trolls a head start: OMG U bash Apple so ur indirectly a GOOGLE SHILL!!1!1
I suspect that there is an ISDS tribunal in the works. Despite admitting otherwise, suspect telecoms could sue for 'lost profits' under Title II regs.
I get the feeling that, if the defendant in question was NOT a sheriff's deputy the judge would have upheld the warrant. The high court / low court phenomenon is very well established.
By the time Leon Panetta was head of the agency, torture (supposedly) stopped. Which makes Tenet/Goss/Hayden responsible for the torture that occurred under their watch. That said, Panetta would have been fully responsible for completing an investigation (or - as we no know - possibly obstructing it) under his watch.
When Glenn Greenwald was a columnist at Salon, the commenters would swamp his articles with all sorts of nastiness whenever he called out the president on misconduct. Says alot about that site...
I wonder if the town crier felt the same way about the introduction of the telegraph...
All these comments and no accusations of Namecheap shilling? Must be a holiday
There's a school of thought that seems to think that those who promote and support legislation in this manner are patriots, with motives pure as the driven snow, concerned only with keeping the nation and its people safe from violent attackI've found that the same group of people who ascribe to this school of thought also reflexively call any expansions of government policy they don't like as being 'nanny state' or similar. Yet the surveillance state is the ultimate 'nanny state' - and an abusive one, to [jack]boot!
They've represented foreigners in US courts in lawsuits challenging torture, the drone program, etc. Wouldn't be much of a legal stretch for them to challenge a lawsuit bought by a foreigner when there are 1st Amendment issues at play for the defendant - I'm assuming any case against Fox News would be bought in US jurisdiction.
Michael Powell should have followed the example his father set and waved a round a vial of fake anthrax to drum up support for his worthless cause.
According to this very site, Governor Christie has previously voiced support for the NSA's mass surveillance. Imagine the damage he could do if given access to our intelligence agencies' data.
Are you high or something? Even if Tim was dismissive of Fox, he came out on the side of free speech.
If there are any ACLU interns who lurk on this site, I humbly suggest that your employers offer their services to Fox News / News Corp pro bono in this case.
Maybe then FOX would drop the whole persecution complex with regards to the ACLU not defending Christians, conservatives or the like.
Hey Techdirt, are you crazy? They posted a copy of your IP! You should issue a takedown notice to stop this Piracy!!!!
I hope that this antibioic - or the process to extract it - isn't locked up behind patents when we need it most.
Connecting the Dots
In a past article, Techdirt covered the White House intelligence task force's report on how to reform the NSA, and the report implied the NSA engaged in financial manipulation. Now fast-forward to this story about SIM Card hacking and you read this:
I'd bet good money the intelligence task force reviewed this operation and freaked out like the rest of us.