Getting kicked out of walmart is because of property rights and laws about trespassing.
Being censored for wrongthink has nothing to do with trespassing.
Why can't you just admit that it's censorship and you just agree with it?
And, yes, there is a MASSIVE fucking difference between being kicked off a private platform, and the government shutting down an entire website. If you can't see that, you're not a "conservative," you're an ignorant fool.
Yes, one is partisan censorship, and the other is justice for being a partisan censor.
Doing nothing: Allowing speech on a platform built to allow posts
Voluntary action: censorship by removing posts to a platform built to allow posts
Compelled action: Being forced to print a letter
You're trying to pretend the first is the third and nobody is falling for that strawman.
That's the core of it. Censorship is a voluntary action, and anti-free speech advocates are pretending doing nothing (leaving posts alone) is something onerous and horrible, and compulsory.
It's dishonest in the extreme.