So, given that human beings pressed to the limit are prone to revenge, no matter the cost, what you're saying is: "Worry!"
Any citizen who was paying attention has known it for over a decade now.
It's just that the other citizens were determined to bury their ass in the sand, then stick their head up their ass.
What the hell do you mean, "Surprise"? I think the word you were looking for was, "Inevitable".
Those tax breaks, subsidies and such never, ever create jobs in any company or industry; or at least not at any rate less than $1 million per minimum wage job.
The money is simply handed to the stockholders...if any of it gets past the executive bonuses.
My first thought on reading this is, "What the hell happened to the EU?"
It used to be U.S. government that was tromping all over the internet; now EU is carrying that torch.
Then I realized (Duh!): The internet bigots have finally achieved regulatory capture in the EU.
It really doesn't matter anyway. You know that if the video shows anything the cops really don't want seen, the "camera will be off" or, oops, "the recording got lost" or "accidentally deleted".
It's my estimate that the number one cause of evidence loss or destruction today is government officials covering up their wrongdoing.
In retrospect, it should have been obvious that the librarians would become champions of free ideas, since they've always lead out in resistance to censorship.
Go, librarians!
FCC (or any other government department having this problem) just needs to send a short missive to NSA for help:
"We think a terrorist wrote one of these messages. And, um, while you're looking for that message, could you summarize the rest of them for us?"
Okay, I should have clarified that: I don't mean they don't deserve to be punished.
But the news flood about this is extremely overdone. This is a page B-29 local interest article only, at best. Trying to make anything more of it only helps enemies of Greenpeace.
I bet Charles Manson would poll well, too, given the right poll. Washington Post should run a good poll for him, then hire him as one of their Lifestyle reporters.
The Greenpeace faux pas is seriously overblown.
I am particularly disheartened that the "political opponents" are trying to make political points on this. Talk about the peak of hypocrisy: There is no group of people on this planet who care for anything (such as world landmarks) less than their pocketbook. If there were something valuable under those Nazca Lines, these are the same people who would plow them under faster than you can say "greed".
So, okay, Greenpeace, definitely not the best thought out action. The landmark took some minor damage, a "ding", but it's not ruined completely.
Stop worrying about this ding and instead worry about some dispassionate multinational digging there next week for road gravel.
They would claim an email address was a "pumpkin", if that will get them past a requirement for probable cause.
My parents always told me, "It takes one to know one." I guess that's how EA knows pirates.
Maybe it took that long to expound the difference between "leaf" and "feather".
Never try to explain technology to a post--it wastes your time and ...wastes your time.
No, you have to understand the terminology. If the government wants the knowledge out there, it's an "unofficial press release"; if the government wanted it to be secret, it's "high treason".
The part I'm most not buying about this article is that these guys took in $81 million
Their real expertise is demonstrated by their taking on this program with no prior qualification; their kiss-ass methods of convincing everyone how valuable they were ("Nothing" means "success"); their obvious salesmanship of their techniques, selling even what the CIA didn't want to buy; and their manipulation of government contracting schemes by obtaining a sole-source--also known as a "no-bid"--contract.
They are experts at suckling the government teat, and little else, it looks to me. That being the case, I'm betting they sucked out much more than $81 million; that's just the over-the-table figure.
Just so darned easy
And just how do we, "...identify children at risk of being drawn into terrorism..."?
Well, it's easy: Muslim!