You're killing me, Tim.
I just want to point out that the UConn women's team went 90-0.
Orwell called the UK "Airstrip One" for a reason.
This leaves aside the question of blatantly illegal content, of course, such as ... real-life filmed violence
So, any of those shows about people injuring themselves doing dumb stunts?
Now I'm even more convinced that cyberbullying laws are a terrible idea.
Better quality, perhaps. I don't know of anyone getting more channels (unless you count those useless secondary channels.) More likely they lost some channels that were on the edge.
I read this as "cyber" already got to him, and he wants to level the playing field.
Television was an essentially childish medium, which had no real effect, for good or ill, on anyone except children.
Truth. And the reason was because viewers weren't in control. Producers had to assume viewers couldn't follow longer story arcs, so most programs were designed to be simple and self contained.
We called it The Idiot Box for a reason.
Not only is the content stolen it out ranks our website in a Google search for the keyword "th taylor"
th taylor, bitches!
In today’s environment, customers are increasingly accessing weather information not only from their TV but from a variety of online sources and apps.
Hopefully Verizon will continue to point out alternatives to its offerings.
Sophisticated criminals will come to count on these means of evading detection. It’s the equivalent of a closet that can’t be opened....
That "closet" metaphor is exactly why we need privacy.
Mirriam Gottfried must have shorted Comcast.
You seem to be doing the opposite of shooting the messenger. Of course the blame lies with the NSA, but it was Snowden's whistleblowing that got Google engineers swearing.
Right. And incoming messages are green regardless of device when using SMS.
I'm bringing it back!
And everyone can say they voted to "do something." It's kind of brilliant.
The Hemmingwrite reminds me of the (now discontinued) AlphaSmart
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaSmart
Re: Re:
interview with Marat and previous article