Tim correctly noted to her that he was not at his computer...
That's oddly phrased. Is Tim often wrong about whether or not he's at his computer?
I'm *all for* congressional staffers being kept ignorant of technological developments.
Seriously. I don't see a down side.
It's the editors trying to hide the fact that they're writing copy themselves.
In fact, a recent study showed very strong evidence that credit has significant value to artists, often outweighing the value of any copyright claim.
So why doesn't Fox provide such credit?
Because they don't want to give up any value, obviously.
Fox is that dude who *never* throws a dollar in a busker's hat.
Exactly.
The argument that "there's no other way to digitize books and recordings" is belied by the fact that they need exclusivity in the first place!
Has Lessig weighed in yet? This seems like his ball of wax.
That joke is copyright Python (Monty) Pictures and is used without permission.
There's something in the water here that makes responses to trolls better than at many other sites (coughyoutube.) I think that it's the result of a tighter focus on subjects, but I'm just guessing there.
Does PACER pay copyright holders? If not, from their perspective, there's no difference. .
Notwithstanding the anger that has been unleashed at Ortiz following Aaron Swartz's death, she should not be regarded as an anomaly.
But she should be made an example of. It seems only fitting.
All speech is a part of history. That's what's at stake.
Significant economic or community impact
... on who?
For the lazy [WARNING: TVTROPES]
*Rises to his feet and begins clapping slowly, but emphatically*
YouTube has to be careful here, or they're going to lose the creative artists who make it more than 'a bunch of cat videos.' Kelvington, another mashup artist, has already left because of similar problems.
Never let the facts get in your way.
Now, assume the position.
I wonder what the percentage of documentaries is? They've traditionally had the hardest time getting funded, but they seem to make up the majority of Kickstarter projects.
Fair Use?
USTR requests that interested persons identify those countries that deny adequate and effective protection for intellectual property rights or deny fair and equitable market access to U.S. persons who rely on intellectual property protection.
I wonder if, say, Google could craft a complaint that lack of Fair Use in a country is harmful to their business.