What are the chances that the real goal of this is to get a legal precedent set that says search engines are liable for anything that happens on any web site they list in their search results?
If Facebook wins this, how long before some website sues users for visiting their site while using an adblocker?
If the Alt-Right movement doesn't like being banned, perhaps they shouldn't be pushing so hard to have social media ban terrorists.
The police don't have to follow the law. After all, since no court has ever ruled that police must obey court orders, they get a free pass due to qualified immunity.
To the politicians who don't want people to be able to see their past, the Internet Archive IS a terrorist site!
The Telecom lobbyists will be all over this bill trying to change it to what they want instead of what's fair to everyone.
Possibly a Freudian slip, but more likely it's because Autocorrect hates me.
This is not holding the I finger liable, nor a third party. This is all the way up to holding a fourth party liable for the infringement.
Two more levels and they will be able to arrest Kevin Bacon.
Just to point out, anything under Creative Commons is covered by copyright. Creative Commons is not an exception to copyright. CReative Commons is an automatically granted license that the copyright holder has elected to grant to anyone meeting the terms of the license. Without the copyright to back it up, a Creative Commons license is meaningless.
You may not have any choice. Remember, you share large amounts of DNA with other members of your family, so if your family members opt into a service like this, they are also making most of your DNA available.
Oh? Which town is it that is overreaching for the revenues?
But a legal drug that anyone can grow in their backyard won't make money for the Pharma Bros.
Not quite. Bell and Telus have a tower sharing agreement. Where there is no Bell service, Bell customers will get service via a Telus tower. Similarly where there is no Telus service, Telus customers get service via Bell towers. It means both companies can offer service everywhere in Canada without having to build two separate networks that both cover the whole country.
As of 2017, the population of Arizona was just a bit over 7 million people. If every single one of them pays that $20 fee, that raises some $140 million. That's not even a rounding error on the $5 billion Trump wants for the wall, let alone the estimates from people with experience in construction projects.
The right to steal works will never become a reality.
The record labels have had a 'right to steal' for a very long time.
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2012/09/19/jamestaylor/
Who gets to define what is, and is not "legitimate trolls/hecklers"?
> moving to a world of protocols, backed by encryption, rather than being a full platform.
That's not going to happen, and for one simple reason. If the power is moved away from the platform and out to the end user, the platform won't be able to suck up all the private information they make their money from. This undermines the business model of pretty much every internet platform out there.
While I think overall the GDPR is a bad law, I won’t be crying any tears over problems it causes for the advertising industry. Laws like the GDPR are a direct result of careless use and abuse of personal data by corporate advertisers.
But only after trying every other option first.
It's funny how the Trump supporters always forget that the government wasn't monitoring communications from the Trump campaign at all. They were monitoring communications with a known Russian intelligence operative. The fact that they swept up Trump campaign communications was simply the result of the Trump campaign workers being in contact with known Russian intelligence operatives.