Now you have a very good reason' NOT' to buy an Apple i Phone censored cameras. Are they positively MAD sabotaging sales of their own products with such concepts?
Having ISPs police the net has serious problems which all Government seem to be blissfully unaware of.
Just think (if you are using Wi-Fi) as you are reading this comment your computer could be easily accessed from a car or a neighbor in your street and it could be downloading illegal material for which you could be fined or imprisoned depending on the content of the download.
This brings me to say that the Laws as to downloading martial as they are cannot be seriously enforced, as anyone could have placed this material on you ISP?s server track record (and or on your computer?s hard drive) simply by carrying out the latter.
As to encryption of your ?Wi-Fi Security System? there are devices that can decrypt any encryption in a matter of minutes sometimes-even seconds.
Remember the pub owner in UK (under Mandy's revised Law) was fined ?8000 when one of his customers was caught downloading copyrighted digital content from the pub?s Wi-Fi See ?Digital Rights Act/ Digital Economy Bill? is legally seriously flawed. http://tinyurl.com/y9nfdga
It is possible that I have discovered a Gaping Hole in Anti Piracy Copyright Laws.
The reason being that Copyrights strength is in the fact that it is ?Legally Regarded? as if written in stone whatever material is under copyright. Hence if you only copy a segment of the original Copyright material it is not theft as it is incomplete. Hence not as the original as the original is a completed script hence taking a single element cannot be judged as Copyright Theft.
Likewise if you copy Copyright Text and change the font it is not as the original yet by changing the wording of text slightly puts you well safe of being charged with copyright theft.
Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot and loosing Billions by small-mindedness:
Many musicians and record companies are in fact loosing out, as they will not allow the use of their music to be played as a backing track. The key reason I say this is most people when editing even a family video like to place a piece of music as a suitable backing track to enhance the effect.
If record companies and musicians allowed their music to be used as backing tracks more people would hear the music and more sales could be made as only when you have heard the music which you may like will you decide to purchase. I have bought most of my music only by first hearing it on a backing-track.
For example there were three beautiful compositions of both music and visual effects on this website Dorset Visual Guide /Swanage area photos and info.
http://dorsetvisualguide.co.uk/swanage.htm but only Corfe Triplet second movement can be played via Youtube. For unfortunately Corfe Triplet first movement and Corfe Triplet third movement which were considered to be the best cannot be viewed due to alleged Copyright infringement of the backing track owned by EMI. Had these three Music Videos been made available for sale I would have paid willingly to own such beautiful pieces of both picture and sound.
Marketing is all about getting your product seen or heard by as wide an audience as is possible this small-mindedness is detrimental to sales. But copying of entire Music CD's I do not agree with it is blatant theft.
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Carl Barron_agpcuk.
Governments fail to realize the benefits
Governments fail to realize the benefits from being able to track offenders by the use of such devices.
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
Plain stupidity fines so high can't afford to pay
More than just excessive profit, just plain stupidity as most people can't afford the fine.
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
Laws to halt you finding the truth
Most of the time Internet Censorship is about stopping Joe Public accessing the truth.
Signed Carl Barron Chairmen of agpcuk
Laws to halt proof of wrong doing
Hence this Law could stop you filming proof of that which is wrong, like Oil Spillage.
i Phone censored cameras
Now you have a very good reason' NOT' to buy an Apple i Phone censored cameras. Are they positively MAD sabotaging sales of their own products with such concepts?
Signed Carl Barron chairman of agpcuk
Having ISPs police the net has serious problems
Having ISPs police the net has serious problems which all Government seem to be blissfully unaware of.
Just think (if you are using Wi-Fi) as you are reading this comment your computer could be easily accessed from a car or a neighbor in your street and it could be downloading illegal material for which you could be fined or imprisoned depending on the content of the download.
This brings me to say that the Laws as to downloading martial as they are cannot be seriously enforced, as anyone could have placed this material on you ISP?s server track record (and or on your computer?s hard drive) simply by carrying out the latter.
As to encryption of your ?Wi-Fi Security System? there are devices that can decrypt any encryption in a matter of minutes sometimes-even seconds.
Remember the pub owner in UK (under Mandy's revised Law) was fined ?8000 when one of his customers was caught downloading copyrighted digital content from the pub?s Wi-Fi See ?Digital Rights Act/ Digital Economy Bill? is legally seriously flawed. http://tinyurl.com/y9nfdga
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
Gaping Hole in Anti Piracy Laws.
It is possible that I have discovered a Gaping Hole in Anti Piracy Copyright Laws.
The reason being that Copyrights strength is in the fact that it is ?Legally Regarded? as if written in stone whatever material is under copyright. Hence if you only copy a segment of the original Copyright material it is not theft as it is incomplete. Hence not as the original as the original is a completed script hence taking a single element cannot be judged as Copyright Theft.
Likewise if you copy Copyright Text and change the font it is not as the original yet by changing the wording of text slightly puts you well safe of being charged with copyright theft.
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot
Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot and loosing Billions by small-mindedness:
Many musicians and record companies are in fact loosing out, as they will not allow the use of their music to be played as a backing track. The key reason I say this is most people when editing even a family video like to place a piece of music as a suitable backing track to enhance the effect.
If record companies and musicians allowed their music to be used as backing tracks more people would hear the music and more sales could be made as only when you have heard the music which you may like will you decide to purchase. I have bought most of my music only by first hearing it on a backing-track.
For example there were three beautiful compositions of both music and visual effects on this website Dorset Visual Guide /Swanage area photos and info.
http://dorsetvisualguide.co.uk/swanage.htm but only Corfe Triplet second movement can be played via Youtube. For unfortunately Corfe Triplet first movement and Corfe Triplet third movement which were considered to be the best cannot be viewed due to alleged Copyright infringement of the backing track owned by EMI. Had these three Music Videos been made available for sale I would have paid willingly to own such beautiful pieces of both picture and sound.
Marketing is all about getting your product seen or heard by as wide an audience as is possible this small-mindedness is detrimental to sales. But copying of entire Music CD's I do not agree with it is blatant theft.
Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk