Disingenuous or not they just added another dollar to this "broadcast fee" bringing it to $8 a month, $96 a year per customer. So obviously they aren't worried about this suit or any other suit regarding the ways they take advantage of the consumer. They're just laughing on the way to the bank knowing that even if they lose they win because as you can see it takes years for them to be held accountable, if ever, and they have had our money to use in the meantime. So they gamble and it looks like they win more than they lose. The deck is stacked against the consumer and the politicians are dealing out the cards.
As long as the politicians are getting "kickback" or donations from the lobby people that run Washington we will never see anything that puts "consumers first"! They are allowing monopolies in almost every consumer service available.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by butterflyflyaway.
Re: Re: Amusingly? You didn't get the memo?
Disingenuous or not they just added another dollar to this "broadcast fee" bringing it to $8 a month, $96 a year per customer. So obviously they aren't worried about this suit or any other suit regarding the ways they take advantage of the consumer. They're just laughing on the way to the bank knowing that even if they lose they win because as you can see it takes years for them to be held accountable, if ever, and they have had our money to use in the meantime. So they gamble and it looks like they win more than they lose. The deck is stacked against the consumer and the politicians are dealing out the cards.
Re: just their way of being "transparent" ...
As long as the politicians are getting "kickback" or donations from the lobby people that run Washington we will never see anything that puts "consumers first"! They are allowing monopolies in almost every consumer service available.