Klein 's Techdirt Comments
Latest Comments (49)
-
Senators Leahy & Tillis To Team Up To Suggest Destroying The Internet For Hollywood’s Sake
Who iS your source Gary page and could you tell me more about the section 230 push to Ban russian website ?
-
Senators Leahy & Tillis To Team Up To Suggest Destroying The Internet For Hollywood’s Sake
Why you think it will pass
-
Senator Klobuchar's Next Unconstitutional Speech Control Bill: The NUDGE Act
what will happens to the internet if this passes
-
EARN ITs Big Knowledge 1st Amendment Problem
Re: Re:
-
EARN ITs Big Knowledge 1st Amendment Problem
-
How The EARN IT Act Is Significantly More Dangerous Than FOSTA
will reddit discord or wikia shutting all their communitites ?
-
[UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re:
-
[UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re:
’s impossible to say what it would look like if the smart copyright act pass is it true ?
i have read on this site : https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2022/03/21/understanding-the-smart-copyright-act/ that It’s impossible to say what it would look like if the smart copyright act bill should pass. The reason is that the bill setups a process for determining what STMs should be used and by whom, but says nothing about what measures could or should be implemented. In short, all that we know is that, if this bill becomes law, there will be a new rulemaking process on this issue and what that process will entail. We do not know what technological measures will be adopted, who they will apply to, or what kinds of content they will be required to block. That is deeply frustrating but also unavoidable. The bill recognizes that technology evolves and advances. Tools that were once industry standards fall behind while new ones emerge. Any system that is going to require online service providers to block infringing uploads needs to be flexible. This was understood with Section 1201 of the DMCA, which is why that rulemaking process was created. This bill simply takes that idea, and applies it to the technological measures to prevent infringing content from being uploaded. While it’s impossible to predict how the U.S. Copyright Office would implement this, the Section 1201 process has shown that they do tend to be conservative with their use of their powers, reserving it for issues where there is limited dispute. That would likely carry over here. Still, the uncertainty that this bill creates is understandable and there is simply no way to know for certain what the Copyright Office might carve out if given the chance do you agree with this? and finally The law makes it clear that such DTMs must be available on nondiscriminatory terms and either royalty-free or on a “reasonable royalty basis.” The goal is to ensure that providers are not overly burdened by this process do you agree with that reasoning ? thanks for your answer guys.