Apple should respond to the DOJ:
No messages were found responsive to your request
disabling all cruise missiles and "smart" bombsWell, cruise missiles work by inertial guidance (and to a degree, location pattern recognition), not GPS; "smart" bombs work via laser guidance (shine a laser on the target and it follows it in).
But, supply a tool and some people will work out how to misuse itI think "use it differently" might be more appropriate -- it is the epitome of "hacking". Granted this case is an example of the "black" form of hacking; to paraphrase Hanover Fist: "They should be torn into itsy little pieces and buried alive."
chemist Jamaica PlainThe chemist's name was Annie Dookhan (Boston Globe article). The lab was located in the Jamaica Plain region of Boston.But I guess the article is about the difficulty of matching names, so I guess it is appropriate :-)
this document seems ridiculously relevant to the debateTrue in many layers. The document/interpretation is likely as ridiculous as the "torture memo" and it most certainly is relevant to any discussion about cyber legislation. Sometimes I just have to wonder about lawyers -- when given a task to prove black equals white they tend not to say "are you nuts?" but "when do you need this?" (and it isn't even about the billable hours!)
"He said Sanders' use of the song was 'tres bien.'"Except the point is about candidates getting prior permission, and there is no indication if Bernie did (and he might have -- I don't know)
sounds like permission to me.
All well and good, but did Bernie approach Buckwheat Zydeco about using "Make A Change"? Or does Buckwheat just like Bernie to begin with and doesn't mind not being asked?
It seems like it is an important piece of information that is missing.
If this money is completely unrelated to criminal activity, the government has just stolen money from one of its citizens.Who cares if it related or unrelated to criminal activity? The TSA (and the airport police) have *no* probable cause for considering it related to criminal activity.
I would think it would choose the path where the least number of automated vehicles would "die". So if it is a choice of hitting a vehicle driven by a human or another Google pod ...
Look at the issues with the liability of airlines following the 11SEP2001 "events". Until the government absolved them, they were on the hook for being sued (negligence contributing to the disaster(s) at the least). At that time security screening was paid for by the airlines; letting the government take it over lets them off the hook if bad guys get through again.
All the security theater has done for me is reduce my willingness to go on airplanes, not because of the airplanes and cattle-car like amenities, but just the pain and hassle of getting through airports. I have better uses for my time.
Huh? There is a disconnect in what you said:
She kept refusing, then got into a shoving match. Many cops would have fired their tasers much sooner.What I heard is her say that if the cop touched her she would sue his ass. What happens then is out of camera frame, but she gets tazed. That's not a shoving match. That's bringing a cannon to a pillow fight.
So, I'm wondering what you think she should have done?
She is a US Citizen, driving in the US. She is stopped at a security checkpoint (and I already hear echos of "papers please"...). They tell her to pull over and then just have her sit there (while they surreptitiously are calling for a drug dog).
She has a right to go about her (legal) business without interference. Security checkpoint, somewhat OK (I have other problems with that, but the courts seem to think they are OK so long as they stop EVERYONE). Unless they have probable cause to detain her they should have let her go on her way immediately.
She knew her rights. She objected. They tazed her. She had the foresight to record the encounter; it didn't seem "in their face" to me -- and THEY are the professionals. They are supposed to know the law, and how to apply it. They f*cked up, and you are blaming the victim.
Pull your head out of your ass.
On our film ‘Expendables 3,’ which has been illegally viewed more than 60 million timesFor a movie that had a total domestic gross of $39,322,544 (from BoxofficeMojo; domestic since they can't be complaining about foreign piracy, right?)
However, only the first time was he speaking to Congress under oath.
The story you linked to at BBC.com has
Last year, Mr Pickles was forced to deny reports his department had spent an extra £10,000 a year on biscuits, blaming an "administrative error" for the big increase in hospitality spendingWhich doesn't look like $110,000, although there was also:
"The sum related to the amount of hospitality we offer... is 17% of the sum the last Labour government spent on hospitality."With no indication what that 17% represents... I presume there are other articles detailing the issue in better depth. Or did you confuse the "£" with an extra "1"?
I certainly feel they should have hit him with the harshest penalties available -- fully expecting him to then get a pardon before they are applied. At least then the hypocrisy would be acknowledged and no precedent in law for wrist-slap vs wrist-cutoff would have been set.
People who work at the highest levels of Government get special treatment; it is not right, but it is what happens, at least until the revolution comes :-).
I love the fact that it seems even the typo's are duplicated. What the hell is a protographer?
He must live in the same dimension where some game makers live -- where games have no problem always-on connections to authentication servers and, of course, that works.
You are evil. Every time I visit XKCD I find myself an hour later wondering where the time went. Evil!
Wow
Just wow. 1st place!