Exclusivity angle worked for Gmaill. Like a charm!
Also Google does something that Facebook hasn't been able to:
Google makes people think carefully about sharing something to specific people instead of the whole world.
Facebook makes people think carefully about sharing something with the whole world instead of specific people.
And we all know which of these two tactics Facebook has had its eye on for ages now.
I'm getting + notifications at the top bar of my Gmail and on Google.com now.
Somehow I can actually see this one succeeding somehow, as opposed to Buzz, Wave, etc.
I wonder what would happen to me if I were to deprive someone of their constitutional civil rights.
THIS:
"Notice how to get around the 1st amendment, the cop thinks all he needs to do is say "I can arrest you for not following a direct order""
Very important.
Is there any type of consequence for the police department or whatever when decisions like this are made? Are there any financial compensation programs when you're falsely arrested?
I've lived in places where police are known to do these things just to intimidate people and they just get away with it. As far as I know in Bulgaria (used to be a Soviet state) and Turkey, not much is done when police officers make 'mistakes' like this; effectively creating police states.
"if you have their email and date of birth"
or even Facebook, or most social networks.
Time machine, trolololol.
but still the point remains standing
Yeah, you're right about that. I'm not sure if that's a proper elaboration or just Nu.nl's interpretation.
I don't know what the big 4 are expecting to get out of not adjusting to the new reality that's being created day by day.
Wow. What it should probably say is "BC, by threat of lawsuits, is bound to release the identities of the individuals tied to those IP addresses."
HAVING A PERSONAL COMPUTER IS A SIGN OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
[/irrationality]
You might want to do some more Googling on me to check out my work experience before discrediting like that ;-)
I don't think there are many online business models that really take such long terms (10 or 20 years) into consideration.
Actually, about that 6%... The profit-line will lie somewhere between 6 and 66%. So just converting 6% (which isn't easy given all the competition + no real added value behind paywall) might be tough by itself.
I realize you're just looking at fact 2 and I love your analysis, but if you're going to talk conversion rates, you need to take the projection from fact 1 into consideration. :)
True. Although the difficulty with that is that people who are subscribing to the print version already get access.
Anyway, I figured the 6 to 66% margin left enough room to factor that in. I don't expect GBC to be high when no extra value is offered. People simply don't get offered a 'reason to buy'.
My main point was just in showing that they really didn't think this paywall through very well and unless they get lucky, they'll have a lot of trouble making it work.
Haha. Maybe he took "I shall make them pay for this!" too literally. ;-)
Re: Re: Re:
I guess they don't want their platform to get as crappy as Facebook and Twitter.
"There was an error posting your update. Please wait a moment and try again."
Fuuuu.