"unless the Department of Justice bugs every reporter's communications" I'd say don't give them ideas, but the five eyes intel agencies have probably been trying to do just that, for everyone, not just reporters.
from where I live in India, checked each url thrice from the three ISPs I use- cable broadband and 2 mobile connections, once at 7:30 pm IST, and again now at 12:30 am IST. So far all of them seem to be accessible. Either the report is mistaken(a prank or troll) or perhaps my ISPs haven't implemented the block yet.
That said, the list provided seems to have very little to do with copyright infringement. Except for dailymotion and vimeo, all the rest seem to be web development and software dev sites. And blocking archive.org makes very little sense.
"I hope you know that I’m a huge believer in the rule of law. But I also believe that no one in this country should be above or beyond the law. There should be no law-free zone in this country."
Does that mean Clapper, Brennan et al are going to face charges?
"The false positives have very real consequences -- sometimes to the point of taking money from independent content creators like Adam, and handing it over to the major labels represented by the RIAA and NMPA."
As far as the **AA's are concerned, that's not a bug, that's a feature. It's the second best option for them (the first being that no-one be able to publish except through them.)
I wish I'd heard about this story a month ago. Just bought an LG fridge. On the other hand, I'll no longer be buying the nexus 5 for myself and my wife. So two lost sales there, LG.
The key difference between the guys who passed along information to other spy agencies and Snowden is that the other guys provided the information to other governments(who do pretty much the same thing to their citizens). Snowden however leaked this info to the US govt's worst enemies: the US public.
About Gibbs' testimony, anyone else feel Steele's next move will be to stall the investigation for as long as possible till Gibbs is no longer healthy enough to testify?
as I see it, is that all the above cases, they did it for what might be said to be personal gain. Aaron on the other hand was acting for what he believed to be public interest or the greater good. Gates, Jobs, Woz, Zuckerberg were all relatively unknown geeky kids fooling around, no threat to those in power, like kids at raves or street racing in stolen cars, except with computers.
But Aaron was already an acknowledged genius, idealistic, an influential internet personality, already in the administration's sights for his activism and the PACER and SOPA/PIPA debacles. That was his undoing. IMO, his crime was not the unauthorized downloads our the trespasses on MIT property, just the fact that his activism and idealism branded him in the eyes of the prosecution as anti-establishment.
"how about this - no one who wrote about this little debate has bothered to call an experienced copyright lawyer and get a comment. I did before I wrote Jim."
Is this lawyer's name Charles Carreon by any chance?
No they can't. Compulsory licenses can be issued for drugs treating serious illnesses, under the TRIPS agreement, specifically the Doha declaration, which has legal effect in the EU.
That actually makes sense, about the mommy and daddy parties. Except it seems more like step parents or foster parents now, with both favouring their own kids (campaign contributors) rather than the American public.
"Took me fifteen minutes to compose this piece"
Too long
http://dilbert.com/strip/1989-05-15
The first video is accurate in one respect
Net neutrality stops the cable companies from screwing their customers.
Am I missing something or is Mr.Edwards suing the American people on behalf of the American people?
Re: You wish
"unless the Department of Justice bugs every reporter's communications"
I'd say don't give them ideas, but the five eyes intel agencies have probably been trying to do just that, for everyone, not just reporters.
Re:
Because they make campaign donations in US Dollars to US politicians. That makes this a US problem.
Been checking the listed sites
from where I live in India, checked each url thrice from the three ISPs I use- cable broadband and 2 mobile connections, once at 7:30 pm IST, and again now at 12:30 am IST.
So far all of them seem to be accessible. Either the report is mistaken(a prank or troll) or perhaps my ISPs haven't implemented the block yet.
That said, the list provided seems to have very little to do with copyright infringement. Except for dailymotion and vimeo, all the rest seem to be web development and software dev sites. And blocking archive.org makes very little sense.
Rule of Law
"I hope you know that I’m a huge believer in the rule of law. But I also believe that no one in this country should be above or beyond the law. There should be no law-free zone in this country."
Does that mean Clapper, Brennan et al are going to face charges?
"The false positives have very real consequences -- sometimes to the point of taking money from independent content creators like Adam, and handing it over to the major labels represented by the RIAA and NMPA."
As far as the **AA's are concerned, that's not a bug, that's a feature. It's the second best option for them (the first being that no-one be able to publish except through them.)
Re: Stop the abuse!!
I wish I'd heard about this story a month ago. Just bought an LG fridge. On the other hand, I'll no longer be buying the nexus 5 for myself and my wife. So two lost sales there, LG.
Karma
As a Buddhist, he ought to be familiar with the concept of karma
if one sows goodness, one will reap goodness; if one sows evil, one will reap evil.
Re: And another thing...
The key difference between the guys who passed along information to other spy agencies and Snowden is that the other guys provided the information to other governments(who do pretty much the same thing to their citizens). Snowden however leaked this info to the US govt's worst enemies: the US public.
Response to: Anon E. Mous on Jun 3rd, 2013 @ 12:50pm
About Gibbs' testimony, anyone else feel Steele's next move will be to stall the investigation for as long as possible till Gibbs is no longer healthy enough to testify?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
so make up some numbers on your own. That's what'creative' folks would do, as exemplified by the **AAs.
the difference
as I see it, is that all the above cases, they did it for what might be said to be personal gain. Aaron on the other hand was acting for what he believed to be public interest or the greater good. Gates, Jobs, Woz, Zuckerberg were all relatively unknown geeky kids fooling around, no threat to those in power, like kids at raves or street racing in stolen cars, except with computers.
But Aaron was already an acknowledged genius, idealistic, an influential internet personality, already in the administration's sights for his activism and the PACER and SOPA/PIPA debacles. That was his undoing. IMO, his crime was not the unauthorized downloads our the trespasses on MIT property, just the fact that his activism and idealism branded him in the eyes of the prosecution as anti-establishment.
Teri Buhl's copyright lawyer
"how about this - no one who wrote about this little debate has bothered to call an experienced copyright lawyer and get a comment. I did before I wrote Jim."
Is this lawyer's name Charles Carreon by any chance?
Re: Re: Re: Who cares
No they can't. Compulsory licenses can be issued for drugs treating serious illnesses, under the TRIPS agreement, specifically the Doha declaration, which has legal effect in the EU.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:157:SOM:EN:HTML
Re: Comment on Anonymous Actions
That actually makes sense, about the mommy and daddy parties. Except it seems more like step parents or foster parents now, with both favouring their own kids (campaign contributors) rather than the American public.
Re: Re: Excessive Pesticides
It would over time probably give rise to newer types of pests to which the plants were not resistant, as pests too can evolve.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
......
(respectful silence)
That was EPIC.
When in a deep hole, dig deeper, by insulting the judge, no less. Did this guy go to the same law school Charles Carreon attended?