But they are not alike. Similar yes but not alike. The tree lines are different, the shore is different, the colors are different, the warer is different, there are far more stars visible in Ryan Bliss's "Song of the Sky" than in the illustration from "Go The F**k To Sleep".
@Matt: Okay first off the images Digital Blasphemy create IS art. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/art for the definition of art and pay close attention to definition #12 which reads: skilled workmanship, execution, or agency, as distinguished from nature. So given that definition any who mass produces digital or 3D renderings is indeed an artist.
As for the rest of your post you seem somehow bitter and antagonistic towards Digital Blasphemy... but I'm not here to psychoanalyze you.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by athynz.
Re: Re: Re: How can it be made more clear?
How can you not see the differences? I listed them above - and yes "water" is misspelled in my post due to a finger slip and not proofreading.
IF this was an exact copy of Ryan Bliss's work then I'd agree with you but it's not.
Re: Anyone who says these aren't alike is blind, or a moron
But they are not alike. Similar yes but not alike. The tree lines are different, the shore is different, the colors are different, the warer is different, there are far more stars visible in Ryan Bliss's "Song of the Sky" than in the illustration from "Go The F**k To Sleep".
Re: OMG
@Matt: Okay first off the images Digital Blasphemy create IS art. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/art for the definition of art and pay close attention to definition #12 which reads: skilled workmanship, execution, or agency, as distinguished from nature. So given that definition any who mass produces digital or 3D renderings is indeed an artist.
As for the rest of your post you seem somehow bitter and antagonistic towards Digital Blasphemy... but I'm not here to psychoanalyze you.