Which is understandable, seeing who the architects were.
Correction: Law enforcement was told so by another party. Thinking is out of the question.
It gets difficult to bring up these topics without sounding like a conspiracy theorist anyway. Keep in mind, if it's not an Internetian you're talking with, they've likely never heard or seen anything that hasn't come straight from the machine.
How do we know that copyright is a big issue?
Even if you deny that damage exists, why would it even be a risk to the tech industry if copyright and the power of "rights" holders had not been inflated beyond reason?
RIAA: The internet is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions!
Rational Person: You mean you're worried about a disaster which is an unreasonably popular fable functionally indistinguishable from communal fantasy?
Yeah, "how the recording industry could avoid punching itself in the face" is such a common thread around here that it needs to be turned into a sticky post.
I know it goes against the views of a lot of people here, but i would rather deal with the destruction of the majors. I don't want to see them succeed. Whether they succeed or fail, it will be at an immeasurable cost to nonaffiliated creators, the sum of legislation and caselaw, and the general public. I think it's worth weighing the damage they have and will continue to cause against the perceived value of their continued presence in the market. It's true, they're more irrelevant today than before. Maybe the independent creators aren't yet poised to fill the exact void that the majors would leave if they disappeared today, but it would get better. That's the crucial advantage.
We need a corporate state corruption wiki.
I imagine that'd last until the next DOJ/ICE takedown batch.
Because the evidence of criminal actions is someone's IP.
Even if we only get this halfway done, i'm game.
At least it'd be the half that stops the damage.
They're not dead simply because the bullets haven't yet been properly applied.
At this point -- with them exerting such horrifyingly dangerous international power with immunity, it seems like the only elegant and timely solution left.
Maybe then, it's appropriate to at least marvel that someone in congress was able to accidentally say something remotely correct. After all, we've been getting a bit overused to shameless statements of ignorance and gross lies (shrouded in extremely tiny veils) from these sorts of people.
Why is it that copyright is only distinguishable from trademark rights when they don't benefit from the conflation?
See, i was reading that comment and my hope was escalating as my brain autocompleted the sentence.
"...and then set their legal team on fire"
Now i'm disappointed.
I'm just waiting for this shit to become the popular 'solution' to open software projects in general. If it's not 'free' they can't compete with, it's 'quality'.
I think that's the reason Google gained its power when it did. It provided a service that wasn't utter horrible shit.
They call those 'accidents'.
/me puts on a blindfold
Why is it so dark in here?
Where did all the light go?
The worst thing is, it's likely that it's exactly that kind of disinformative twittershitting that they expect to wrangle everyone to produce. They can't have an uncontrolled information outlet, evidence of reality might leak out and devalue their investments in lies.
Ugh. Sometimes I can't tell if I'm overdramatizing or if things really are that ridculous.
Strategy? Hell, the only thing publishers and labels know about chess is that it involves pawns, and they like crushing those.
We can play the same game.
"You can stand with us, or you can stand with the neofascists and corporate shills."
The logical outcome
You might face some legal issues if you try making an effigy with via CAM or anything. Dodd will surely claim you're infringing on his copyrighted likeness.