Pretty sure the documents would make a good war crimes case if the US ever allowed it.
That said, I'd rather be waterboarded than be forced to listen to Beiber for any extended period...
how odd... it appears that the cadre of security apparatus white-knighters all took the same day off....
Demanding that the government follow the provisions in the Bill of Rights is not a "false sense of entitlement".
There are plenty of people who didn't violate any laws but had to deal with over-aggressive law enforcement. To pretend otherwise is intellectually dishonest.
that's a hell of a rant. That covers a niche situation accounting for maybe 1% of pirated copies.
You are ignoring that the user in question admitted to pirating it. Also that these days installing a cracked game that was originally only available on pc through steam requires you to jump through a couple hoops to allow it to be ignored by steam. You don't get tricked into running this.
and if you had actually fucking read the article, the popup doesn't prohibit anyone from playing. You just click it and keep having fun.
It's just a wink to pirates that it's pirated. Doesn't phone home, doesn't delete saves, doesn't corrupt anything, doesn't interrupt play.
There are plenty of bad examples of DRM to martyr yourself on, this isn't one of them.
here's the thing. Would you put more trust in some random internet cracker with no reputation that matters on the line, or with a company that seems for all the evidence to do the right thing with millions of dollars at stake?
Not saying to trust corps at all, but if you are going to draw a trust line that far down the sand then you better get really good at cracking games yourself.
dude... take your meds. seriously.
probably because your non-english ranting makes no sense...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gv0H-vPoDc
If you actually READ the post, the actions that got charges filed were for different dates than the one you quoted. There is more to this story we don't have public yet.
The incidents that brought the charges are not detailed in this post, don't base your bullshit on the stuff techdirt commented on.
congrats on the win, here's hoping you actually get some cash out of these assholes.
This is pretty much exactly what i came in here to say.
He means it doesn't default to https. as it (and most everything online in a properly configured world) should do.
Wait... rational, respectful, non-inflamatory, non ad-hom discussion that stays on topic through several replies?!?!?! Are we still in the Techdirt comments section?!?!
ahem.
TheFatMan has a few valid points about the process, and i totally agree that the Examiners are in a seriously untenable position of having to work within a set of rules and guidelines that rarely directly relate to what anyone fairly well-versed in IP issues would call common sense. That said, I don't think Mike was talking about the Examiners here. As detailed in several previous articles and in the newly posted Amazon-white-background-photo debacle, you guys don't have to "go after patent trolls". All you need to do is not grant patents for obvious crap.
Now I totally understand that your ruleset and guidelines for such things are seemingly fluid and sometimes contradictory, and I know that most of the people in your position are good people trying to adhere to the policies they are given. Which is why almost all the criticism and snark about the USPTO is aimed at the leadership, not you guys in the trenches. I am far too lazy to lookk up supporting links right now, but a simple search for 'USPTO' on Techdirt will probably cover it.
You're both right... the data would be useful, but without the comparative data from a VPN connection, not of much value. Anyone tech savvy enough to know how to compare the traffic on a VPN would also know how to run their own traceroutes, so I would say it is ultimately not necessary to include it on every stream.
double whoooosh....
whooooosh.....
AHHHH yes the real motivation comes out.
I would bet a paycheck she is either involved with scientology or being paid by them, the book is a barely disguised Cruise wank-fest, and this article is just drumming up business for the book.
Re:
It's the alcohol producers that are against maryjane, the tobacco co's are spearheading the stupid regulations on vaporizers