"bomb a Portland Christmas tree lighting ceremony" ..."as the entire "plot" was created with undercover FBI agents."
And O'Reilly hasn't picked up on this as the latest salvo by the Obama administration in the war on Christmas?? Seems like a great opportunity to enlist Fox News against the NSA.
Also, every time one of their old macs crash, they have to evacuate the school.
There are more variables to the equation than simply the lack of publication costs. People with e-readers tend currently towards the high end of the income spectrum. And at least a measurable minority, including myself, are willing to pay just as much or more for an ebook.
I've managed to reduce my book collection from 7000+ to a few hundred, and I absolutely do not want the clutter of another physical book. I don't want to wait for it to be shipped to me, and I don't want to deal with it after I've finished reading it. I strip Amazon's DRM with calibre and keep around 800 books on my Kindle.
So, I'll happily pay equal price or even more for an ebook copy. Multiple times in the last few years, I've forgone reading books that sound interesting because they're not in an ebook format. Blame me, and people like me, if you wish.
What if you like fire in a crowded theater?
It's hard to get even slightly excited about a new Chopin recording. His works have been recorded dozens of times. A year never passes without indistinguishable new Chopin CDs being cranked out.
Meanwhile, vast, vast amounts of worthy sixteenth and seventeenth century music sits around, never having been recorded and most never even performed in the modern era.
SMBC covered this pretty well:
http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2951
Wow, so every CD-R sold in Canada is an "audio CD-R"!
Remember those, in the last days of record stores? Sold near the cash register, marked up because of the royalties paid to music industry? They had great little descriptions on them "Designed for premium audio experience" and "bit-perfect recording for when it matters for your sound experience".
"You are asking us to accept a meaning which is the opposite of the original meaning."
So? Such things are already common enough that we have a word for entire class: contranym. You can run fast, or you can be stuck fast. You determine what is meant by context.
The figurative use of literal (which is NOT new--it's almost as old as the word itself) is most often used in the context of hyperbole. There's the context needed.
Words naturally accrue other meanings as time passes. "Truly", "really", and "actually" for a brief time meant in a true, real, or actual manner. They still can mean that, in context. Or, in other context, like hyperbole:
It's been such a dismal day I'm really dying for some amusement," said Meg
"Grinded" was not uncommon 2 centuries ago:
http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=grinded&year_start=1797&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=
Clicking on the examples, they look like typical well-edited text of the period.
Man, I knew it was a bad idea to adopt a binary alphabet.
Of course, a lot of the evidence against John Walker Lindh was obtained after he was repeatedly denied access to a lawyer, and when he was threatened with denial of pain medicine and treatment for agonizing wounds. He was kept in the conditions that make Manning's solitary treatment look positively generous and humane (completely restrained, blindfolded, locked in a metal container in near-freezing conditions, subjected to sleep deprivation).
Words spoken four centuries ago: "Treason doth never prosper: what?s the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
I didn't realize Obama had replaced Perry as our governor.
"The OCLC made the news a decade or so ago when they sued The Library Hotel in New York for numbering their hotel rooms using it."
I remember that story! It looks like they weren't successful in their lawsuit:
http://www.libraryhotel.com/dewey-decimal-system.html
"When they passed the seatbelt law it was stated they would not pull you over just because..."
Who stated that? 51 seatbelt laws were passed in 50 states plus the district of Columbia. I remember when it passed in Texas--I had been driving 9 months. The law had a 4-month grace period where you would only be granted a warning, but on Dec 1 1985, everyone was told if they weren't wearing a seatbelt, they'd be pulled over and ticketed. My dad was ticketed twice within the first year of the law.
"not just fake gnostics like Richard Dawkins."
I'm just curious about this response. I've seen a couple reports in the mainstream media that Richard Dawkins is an "agnostic". It's pretty clear, after reading, that none of the authors have ever read any of Dawkins' books, or anything more than the most basic summary.
But to accuse him of being a gnostic, an adherent to one of the mystery religions prominent around the east and south regions of the Mediterranean basin in the second and third century C.E., that believes in secret knowledge delivered by divine forces... that seems beyond the pale. What evidence do you have to accuse him of such ... outright, frank irrationality?
Re:
"That STILL doesn't necessarily describe identity theft. You have to use the information to IMPERSONATE the person for an unlawful purpose for it to be identity theft."
It may not describe identity theft in the popular imagination, but it describes it well under California statutory law: obtaining personal information and using it for an unlawful purpose.