Another 19th Century Moral Panic: Theater

from the everything-is-evil dept

Every so often, we've written about examples of historical "moral panics" -- those moments when "concerned citizens" (often including the press and/or politicians) freaked out about the moral horrors of... some awful "new" thing. You all know the obvious ones: like comic books and Dungeons & Dragons, but we like to highlight the truly oddball ones that people these days don't realize were ever possibly considered a threat to our moral fabric. Things like chess and the waltz. Oh, and of course the printing press. Evil, evil, evil filthy things that will warp the minds of our young people and make them lazy, violent and degenerate.

A few years ago, we wrote about the delightful skewering of a couple of Thomas Edison inventions in the NY Times in 1878: the phonograph and the "aerophone" (a sort of loudspeaker). Here's a snippet from that report:
THE AEROPHONE.

Something ought to be done to Mr. EDISON, and there is a growing conviction that it had better be done with a hemp rope. Mr. EDISON has invented too many things, and almost without exception they are things of the most deleterious character. He has been addicted to electricity for many years, and it is not very long ago that he became notorious for having discovered a new force, though he has since kept it care- fully concealed, either upon his person or elsewhere. Recently he invented the phone- graph, a machine that catches the lightest whisper of conversation and stores it up, so that at any future time it can be brought out, to the confusion of the original speaker. This machine will eventually destroy all confidence between man and man, and render more dangerous than ever woman's want of confidence in woman. No man can feel sure that wherever he may be there is not a concealed phonograph remorseless gathering up his remarks and ready to reproduce them at some future date. Who will be willing, even in the bosom of his family, to express any but most innocuous and colorless views and what woman when calling on a female friend, and waiting for the latter to make her appearance in the drawing-room, will dare to express her opinion of the wretched taste displayed in the furniture, or the hideous appearance of the family photographs ? In the days of persecution and it was said, though with poetical exaggeration, that the walls had ears.

Thanks to Mr. Edison's perverted ingenuity, this has not only become a literal truth, but every shelf, closet, or floor may now have its concealed phonographic ears. No young man will venture to carry on a private conversation with a young lady, lest he should be filling a secret phonograph with evidence that, in a breach of promise suit, would secure an immediate verdict against him, and our very small-boys will fear to express themselves with childish freedom, lest the phonograph should report them as having used the name of "gosh," or as having to "bust the snoot" of the long-suffering governess. The phonograph was, at the time of its invention, the most terrible example of depraved ingenuity which the world had seen; but Mr. EDISON has since reached a still more conspicuous peak of scientific infamy by inventing the aerophone--an instrument far more devastating in its effects and fraught with the destruction of human society.
Apparently that year -- 1878 -- was a big one for moral panics. The twitter feed of the wonderfully named "Pessimists Archive" recently tweeted out another story from 1878, discussing the addictive horrors of... the theater (dramatic music cue). From the article:
Whole evenings are squandered away. "Night unto night" teacheth not "knowledge," but the reverse. Can it be for the good of any young person to form such a habit? He may think that he can go and stop, but often stopping becomes next to impossible. Whenever the flaming posters are seen a restlessness steals on--a craving is created. Duty becomes drudgery; industry grows tiresome; business a bore. Arrant shiftlessness is the result.
What a horrible world. But apparently the author is just getting warmed up:
Theatre-going has a very dissipating influence on the mind. It takes away the taste for serious thought, solid reading, sensible conversation and spiritual employments. The glitter and glare of the theatre, the attitudes and attire of the performers, the looks and language of the spectators are not favorable to devotion. In enjoying the pleasures of sin for a season, we lose relish for the pleasures forevermore at God's right hand. The most limited experiences amongst us in theatrical courses will attest that nothing is apter to impart a vain and frivolous cast to the mind, to familiarize it with loose images and objects, to rub off the delicate enamel from the conscience, to deteriorate the spirit of devotion, and to destroy that true spirituality which is the Christian's glory and joy. If you wish to have your heart draw away from what is pure, pious, sober, useful, and get in sympathy with what is gay, showy, sentimental, sensual, extravagant; to dwell in a world of romance rather than reality; to look to the things seen and temporal rather than to the things that are unseen and eternal--then by all means rush with one accord into the theatre.

Theatre-going is injurious to morals. One of the causes which contribute to this is the nature of the plays acted. There is a drama which is comparatively pure. But what is called the "legitimate drama" has been tried again and again in circumstances most favorable to its success, and has almost invariably brought bankruptcy to the well-meaning triers of the experiment. Pieces redolent with the odor of brothels and bar-rooms, and with a spice of devilry in them, are the popular ones.
You've been warned.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Arioch (profile), 2 Sep 2016 @ 9:39pm

    "Pieces redolent with the odor of brothels and bar-rooms, and with a spice of devilry in them, are the popular ones."

    Wow!

    While being known as quite dissolute type, I am well aware of bar rooms and the spice of devilry.

    But I am not (as apparently the writer is!) aware of what the odor of a brothel is.

    Nothing really changes when it comes to our so called "ruling class"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2016 @ 12:50am

    Pray tell!... John!... what do you perceive as the "ruling class"?... and who do you perceive as its "ruling members"? Who... John!... does this "oficionado of brothels" "rule"? Surely, not those whom he or she has hoped to sway!... nor Edison! Nor the descendants of the "would-be swayed"!... or, of Edison? Your folly!... John!... would be to ascribe "rulership" to those who manifest otherwise!... who assume a mantle, that providence has bestowed on yet others! Airs, are not synonymous with authority!... nor, is the belittlement of the unknown, and of those who fashion mysterious devices! As one great line reads:... "You are subject to that which you give yourself servant to obey!" Simply put!... do not subject yourself as servant (even unwittingly!) to obey, that which is/ who is, not worthy of your subjugation!... less, such rule you, by default!
    .
    Please!... no emails!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2016 @ 2:05am

    The more things change...

    "a machine that catches the lightest whisper of conversation and stores it up, so that at any future time it can be brought out,"

    This function has been taken over by the NSA.

    Nothing to see here. Move along...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      TRX (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 4:15am

      Re: The more things change...

      Yep. I'm not seeing anything in the least amusing about the author's warning. Between the NSA and smartphone apps, I think he nailed it dead center.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Kal Zekdor (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 7:03am

        Re: Re: The more things change...

        Exactly! The technology is to blame! How could anyone presume to hold these individuals accountable for their actions? The very idea is absurd! Clearly these nefarious actions were undertaken whilst beholden to the siren song of this insidious serpent named Science! These unfortunate souls are by nature morally upstanding citizens, and, absent the corrupting hand of technology, they would not hurt a fly. Why, it's not as though there's an entire history of widespread surveillance going back thousands of years, so the technology must be the impetus of this trend!

        In other news, Congress recently passed a law making murder legal. One Senator, discussing the new law, said "Murder used to be a serious crime. Back in my day, a man who took another's life was considered an extremely evil individual. That all changed with these new-fangled assault rifles. Nowadays, anyone can just stop by a Walmart on the way to the office, pick up an AR-15 and a box of ammo, and empty out the whole godforsaken building! It's just so easy to kill folks these days, it seems foolish to make it illegal."

        /s

        More seriously, yes, the advances in technology have created dangerous new tools that can, and are, being used to the detriment of our society. However, a tool has no moral judgment associated with it. A hammer is neither good nor evil, it simply is. Moral weight can only be ascribed to the users of a tool.

        Further, the ease of performing an immoral action does not suddenly make it any less immoral. True, it may mean that bad actors are more likely to be able to carry out these immoral actions, but that does not convey a moral judgment on the tool. (Not to mention that "un-inventing" something is a fools errand.) Society must judge the bad actors directly, instead of wishing to put the genie back in the bottle.

        More specifically, complaining about the ubiquity of tools that can be used for surveillance is not only pointless, it's actively detrimental to actually stopping any of the widespread surveillance. We need to focus on curtailing this activity from the top-down, putting in place strict behavioral guidelines for organizations like the NSA, the FBI, the DEA, etc., and, most importantly, real oversight with the ability to enforce those guidelines. (Of course, in the current political climate, that's not likely to happen, so we have some preliminary work to do before then....)

        One last note: The casual sexism in that phonograph article is just... depressing.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Seegras (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 11:46pm

          Re: Re: Re: The more things change...

          We need to focus on curtailing this activity from the top-down, putting in place strict behavioral guidelines

          "strict behavioural guidelines". Is that an euphemism? Because actually the only thing that's even near a possible solution is to totally OUTLAW SURVEILLANCE. Like slavery, it's an abomination.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Wendy Cockcroft, 5 Sep 2016 @ 5:55am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: The more things change...

            Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. I can see a role for targeted surveillance with the application of a warrant and overseen by an agency with teeth.

            Mass surveillance should indeed be outlawed. I'm with you on that.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2016 @ 4:22am

    Little known facts

    Second cave drawing, naked ladies
    Second stone tablet, errotic stories
    Second thing off the printing press, naked ladies.
    Second telegram sent, man arranging to meet his mistress.
    Second recording on the phonograph, errotic stories told by women of the night.
    Second photograph taken, naked ladies.
    Second phone call, phone sex.
    Second movie, porn
    Second home movie, porn
    Second VHS tape, porn
    Second CD, errotic audio book
    Second DVD, porn
    Second digital image, naked ladies
    Second message sent on the Internet, errotic stories
    Second website, porn
    Second internet movie, porn
    Second commercial website on the Internet, porn

    That's why every new communication method is meet with moral panic.
    When imagining the possibilities of new technology the second thing on everyone's mind is how it will be easier to get their rocks off.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2016 @ 4:30am

    Satire

    The Edison piece reads like satire, to me.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Daydream, 3 Sep 2016 @ 4:32am

    George_Takei_Oh_My.wav

    "Something ought to be done to Mr. EDISON, and there is a growing conviction that it had better be done with a hemp rope."

    "...Mr. Edison's perverted ingenuity..."


    I'm sorry, I'll actually read the article now.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DNY (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 6:10am

    Anti-theater not actually an example of "moral panic" at the new

    While the anti-Edison piece is a comparable example to the "moral panics" over comic books, D&D and video games, the denunciation of the theater is not.

    Anti-theater attitudes have their roots in the conflict between Christianity and paganism (cf. the scandal caused by Justinian marrying an actress* and the ancient canons forbidding Christian priests from attending theatrical performances) and revive periodically (cf. Cromwell closing all the theaters in England).

    *Admittedly if Theodora's attitude toward sex was as recorded in Procopius's Secret History there was adequate reason to be scandalized by someone marrying her, but the polemics of the time were directed at her having been an actress.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Groaker (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 9:57am

      Re: Anti-theater not actually an example of "moral panic" at the new

      Christianity made significant use of the theater during medieval times, in what are called morality plays. The devil was typically symbolized by the wearing of red hair, and is the ancestor of today's clown.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2016 @ 1:51pm

        Re: Re: Anti-theater not actually an example of "moral panic" at the new

        "The devil was typically symbolized by the wearing of red hair"

        A ginger! I knew it!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Telzey, 3 Sep 2016 @ 8:13am

    I remember reading a list from a book of "Rules for Our Young Ladies", given to incoming students at an upper-class finishing school for girls which stated that anyone caught with any of the works of William Shakespeare would be expelled. All that violence and naughty references to sex made him a no-go for the virtuously virginal. It was a US school, I doubt European schools would ban Shakespeare, and I do seem to remember it dated from the 1880s. That era seems to have been a boom time for the virtuous, or the dirty-minded, depending on your outlook.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Skeeter, 3 Sep 2016 @ 10:34am

    Irony

    Irony is their fear of that time (1800's) of being recorded in truth and having it used against them at a later date; while the modern day is a greater concern against being recorded, taken out of context, having the recording altered or modified, and then used to 'bear false witness' against us at the whim of some diabolical group or person.

    In both instances, however, it seems that the loss of privacy is the sole root of this evil. Seems we just can't take a hint after all.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Groaker (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 2:38pm

    Give it up

    There is no privacy anymore. What the government doesn't know about you, it can find out. NSLs have been so grossly abused that less that one percent are used for terrorism. And I would assume that many of that one percent, 100% of the participants are undercover LEOs or their CIs.

    Your medical, tax, spending and all other records are a letter away from being perused, stored, used against you, and grossly abused. Not just by our faithful government, but by some or all corporations depending on the classification. And of course, what can not be explicitly obtained can usually be inferred.

    "Smart TVs" and most CTV boxes can record conversations, including the last time someone had sex on the living room couch. Who knows what comes out of the mouths of toddlers -- they like to repeat what they hear.

    Pay by cash? Sometimes its private, sometimes its facial recognition.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Sep 2016 @ 2:53pm

    A clear warning about advertisement

    Whenever the flaming posters are seen a restlessness steals on--a craving is created.


    A clear warning about the dangers of advertisement and *no one* has ever done anything about it.

    If we don't stop these harmful advertisements, people feel craved to go to a theatre, or smoke cigarettes, buy a bigger car, feel unhappy about their figure.

    Hurry, if we're quick we can undo this 138 years of damage to mankind before it's too late.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Padpaw (profile), 3 Sep 2016 @ 9:20pm

    The common theme seems to be a refusal to take responsibility for ones own actions. Instead look for anything and everything to blame.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Sep 2016 @ 1:54am

    Just gonna drop this here:

    >
    ― Robert A. Heinlein

    Frankly, throughout history cultural, political and social backlash to novel things are the norm not the exception.

    People fear what they don't understand and all that...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Whatever (profile), 5 Sep 2016 @ 1:56am

    Gotta giggle at this...

    I always get a giggle when I read one of these articles. Not because of the content (which is often funny enough) but rather at the somewhat unsubtle attempts to create a sort of mind space for Techdirt's ideas to exist.

    The concept tag teams very well with the sloganism found on t-shirts and in other Techdirt memes. It's a rather obvious way of defining the universe and attempting to lend credence to stands that are often controversial, and sometimes just plain wrong.

    It gives Mike and the other writers here a sort of magic bag of tools for dealing with people who don't agree with them. They can write contrary opinions off as moral panics, and say that history has a long list of these panics - so clearly, any objection is just a moral panic.

    The sloganism is often an attempt to either over simplify or generalize in a fashion that creates an out for many objections. "Copying is not theft" is a perfect example. The truth is far from that simple statement, which leads the faithful to paraphase as "copying / pirating isn't illegal!" - when it fact it is. Copying may or may not be theft (it was until 2006 in the UK, when the fraud act was refined), but there are plenty of circumstances where it's not legal or violated the legal rights of others. The zippy slogan creates a sort of invisibility cloak for all sorts of illegal things, because, well... copying.

    Perhaps my post will be dismissed as a moral panic. The Techdirt audience is well prepared for that vapid dismissal.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Mother Whatever, 5 Sep 2016 @ 7:01am

      Re: Gotta giggle at this...

      Junior! You forgot your medicines again?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Whatever (profile), 6 Sep 2016 @ 4:15am

        Re: Re: Gotta giggle at this...

        No meds required - the endless desire to self-medicate and be medicated is an American concept... that's not something I need or desire.

        Just pointing out the obvious - talking about moral panics generally sets you guys up to be more accepting of it's application to modern situations. It's a great tool for dismissing points of view people don't otherwise want to talk about.

        Honestly, I applaud Mike and the crew for working so diligently to slowly but surely draw mental boundaries for the followers to think in. It's an impressive amount of work to pretty much control and contain the discussion.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 5 Sep 2016 @ 7:06pm

      Re: Gotta giggle at this...

      Shooting unarmed citizens after spying on them without evidence of wrongdoing is legal. Any criticism against this is a moral panic.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 6 Sep 2016 @ 10:59am

      Re: Gotta giggle at this...

      which leads the faithful to paraphase [sic] as "copying / pirating isn't illegal!"

      Citation needed.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Whatever (profile), 6 Sep 2016 @ 5:36pm

        Re: Re: Gotta giggle at this...

        "copying isn't theft", which leaves the reader to conclude that copying isn't a crime.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          nasch (profile), 6 Sep 2016 @ 8:04pm

          Re: Re: Re: Gotta giggle at this...

          That's not a citation, it's more hand waving. And ridiculous besides, as it assumes that the only crime in the world is theft.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Whatever (profile), 7 Sep 2016 @ 3:37am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Gotta giggle at this...

            Yup, and that is the assumption that Techdirt (and others) try to push. Since it's not "theft" in their reading of the law, clearly it's legal! Basically, it's a trick of making you choose "theft or not theft" and be choosing by inference if it's legal or not. It sort of short circuits the discussion of the greater implications by both the legal and moral issues of piracy.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Sep 2016 @ 2:41am

    Edison did not invent any of those examples. He might have patented it and exploited the real inventor, but that is a different thing

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Groaker (profile), 6 Sep 2016 @ 7:19am

    Worse, such complaints are terroristic traitorous acts against the State.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.