Trademark

by Timothy Geigner


Filed Under:
coke zero, trademark, zero

Companies:
coca cola



The 'Coke Zero' Trademark Madness May Finally Be Coming To An End

from the finally dept

Did you know that Coca-Cola has been attempting to get a trademark on the word "zero" for beverages in the United States for well over a decade? Yes, the most well-known soft-drink maker, which sells a product called 'Coke Zero', first filed for a trademark on the single word in 2003. The fight has been ongoing ever since, with Dr. Pepper Snapple Group opposing the trademark, because, well, lots of other beverage companies use that common word and because of course it did. Oddly, we covered a trademark case a few years back in which Coca-Cola was on the receiving end of a trademark suit over its use of the word, that time from a water company that offered a product it had named 'Naturally Zero.' Of note was Judge John Lee's justification for siding with Coca-Cola in that case:

U.S. District Judge John Lee said that the “Naturally Zero” label straightaway conveys to consumers that the product is without calories or additives, and therefore not suggestive enough to supply a trademark that is inherently distinctive for a beverage label.
That opinion appeared to be a sign of things to come. Coca-Cola had lost its bid to trademark the word "zero" in the U.K. after regulators sided with Pepsi Co.'s opposition. Just weeks ago, as well, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office rejected Coca-Cola's application entirely, reasoning that the use of the word zero was descriptive of the caloric content of the drink. These rulings, along with ongoing challenges by Coke to others using the word for beverage products, have become the setting for what will be an upcoming ruling by the U.S. Trademark Office, which should finally put to rest the dispute between Coke and Dr. Pepper.
Arguments wrapped up in December, after Coke and Dr Pepper logged hundreds of pages of arguments and exhibits in 170 filings with the U.S. trademark office. A ruling could come before the summer, based on past trademark registration disputes, say people familiar with the case.

If Coke prevails, it could more easily sue imitators. If it loses, it could face an onslaught of competitors such as Dr Pepper's Diet Rite Pure Zero, who take the name and dilute a brand that has turned out to be a star for Coke in a game that has been rough going.
I would contend that the above is improperly written, as the barrage of oppositions from and against Coke suggests the onslaught of competition already exists. That should have been expected, because we're talking about the word "zero" here, and in an industry rife with no-calorie drinks, how could that word not be in common usage?

More interesting to me will be to see how the USPTO ruling lines up with our neighbors in the world. There seems to be little sense in arguing anything other than that the word "zero" ought to be free for use rather than locked up behind trademark protections. Should the USPTO rule differently, however, it will serve as a nice and tidy example of just how crazy the office is in leaning towards protectionism as a rule.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 24 Feb 2016 @ 12:13am

    "Dr Pepper's Diet Rite Pure Zero, who take the name and dilute a brand"

    OMG if they are able to call a product that I would totally assume that the contents of the bottle are coke because of the word zero on the label, and ignore all of the other words.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 24 Feb 2016 @ 12:50am

    Dibs on "zilch" and "nada"!

    Let's corner the diet drink market!

    Actually, "Lemon nada" might make it through a trademark registration. And how about "Zilch worm", the mezcal for vegetarians?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Feb 2016 @ 1:47am

    How about we stop allowing companies to trademark generic words that have no direct relationship to their company branding FULL STOP

    Especially if they cannot prove the service/product they are delivering in connection to that word is unique.

    I'm pretty sure there are enough "zero"/"light"/etc. versions of various products and services that such a trademark should have been denied from the start.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mark Wing, 24 Feb 2016 @ 2:14am

    I'm totally creating a new soda named Zero Pepper. I was holding out for Nurse Pepper but Zero makes it really pop.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Feb 2016 @ 2:53am

    I think its dangerous to allow trademarks of single words
    and phrases in common use .
    Phrase,s not even invented by the company seeking the trademark .
    Coke can put a label on the can ,
    no calories ,or zero calories or continue to
    use coke zero without a trademark.
    IF you did not invent a word or a phrase
    you should not be allowed to trademark it.

    No idiot buys pepsi zero or cola zero and
    thinks they are buying coke .
    eg sony tried and failed to get a us trademark
    the phrase lets play in regard to video games played
    and streamed online .
    IF it had got a trademark it might have
    been able to take down 1000,s of video,s
    or demand a revenue share of videos
    streamed online of gameplay videos .

    rather than trying to take ownership of a common
    word that is useful for consumers to choose food ,
    ie let any company state this drink has zero calorie,s
    And compete in the market place
    on quality or price .

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      David, 24 Feb 2016 @ 3:51am

      Re:

      I think its dangerous to allow trademarks of single words
      and phrases in common use .
      Phrase,s not even invented by the company seeking the trademark .

      Apple MacIntosh. Word for Windows. Yahoo (maybe they should have gone for Houyhnhnm instead: Houyhnhnm.com does not appear taken yet apart from cybersquatters).

      And Coca Cola is purely descriptive, listing two ingredients. It's like a cookie brand Sugar Flour.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 10 Mar 2016 @ 3:20am

        Re: Re:

        And Coca Cola is purely descriptive, listing two ingredients. It's like a cookie brand Sugar Flour.


        water forty sugar sixty coke zero®

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 24 Feb 2016 @ 4:05am

    Intellectual Property: making ZERO sense since it began.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Feb 2016 @ 5:09am

    You can not IP a number

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    This Will Kill You, 24 Feb 2016 @ 9:13am

    ASPARTAME

    Aspartame will pickle you as one of the key ingredients in aspartame, which has been used since the early 1970s, is converted to FORMALDAHYDE at 86 degrees F in your body.

    If there is any use of the word ZERO as it relates to soda or soft drinks, it should be ZERO "Aspartame." OR, don't drink it.

    Write to your Congress person and tell them you know aspartame will kill you and should be BANNED.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 24 Feb 2016 @ 12:47pm

    From the legal minds that brought you - 'no consumer could reasonably be misled into thinking vitaminwater was a healthy beverage.' The Zero Wars!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ed, 24 Feb 2016 @ 1:41pm

    Champagne was first

    Zero dosage fizz has been around since at least the 'seventies.
    http://www.wine-searcher.com/regions-champagne+brut+nature+-+zero

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2016 @ 3:21pm

    Cocaine Zero, the TSA took it all.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.